| 73Q Music Videos | Vote On Clips | Submit | Login   |
Submitted Videos | Favorited Videos | Voting History | Comment History | Hopper History | Login to Compare
John Holmes Motherfucker

Previous Next 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228
Comments
Thunderf00t: More on how Anita Sarkeesian is picking on me.
09/23/14, 13:20

I have no idea, and I didn't even know he was on twitter. But if it was up to meI would take him off youtube today, for this fucking thing right here. Making false accusations about someone who is currently the target of large-scale harassment is an unbelievably irresponsible thing to do. And these fucking idiots are just eating it up.

He's claiming that Anita personally got him kicked off twitter, and his proof is just transparent nonsense. He's got a list of three rules, and he's using the process of elimination to determine that he was banned on the third rule, and for some reason that I don't need to know, that could only be Anita.

But the text clearly says that these are only some SOME of the ways you can get banned for targeted abuse, because you can't make a list of every possible way people can be abused. You can't use the process of elimination to determine something if the list doesn't contain every option. So there's no proof that he was banned for number 3. So the argument just collapses.

And this other thing? The one with the English server, and the American spelling of color? I can't even follow that shit.

If the FBI is really investigating the threats, which is what I've read, they're probably watching him with great interest.
Thunderf00t suspended from twitter, blames Sarkeesian, acts like a total drama queen
09/23/14, 08:24

>>> Anita Cuntkeesian claims that someone threatened her life, but provides no evidence, and she's fucking coddled while anyone who dares to question her story is labeled a mansplaining MRA rape supporter.

You're acting like this is somehow unusual, as if crime victims have always been expected to publicly prove that the crimes happened in order to be taken seriously, and you seem to think that this crime seems unlikely to you. Why, I can almost hear you ask, would anyone want to threaten Anita Cuntkeesian?

I think that you and I have different ideas of what "questioning" means. I know that shit like that really happens. When I was in college, there was a case where the Jewish Student Union was vandailized, and the perp turned out to be the JSU president. Ask me if I know for a fact that she didn't fake the threat, and I'll tell you that I don't, show me some evidence that isn't easily explained bullshit. Someone contacted that award ceremony with a bomb threat, and that's a damn crime. The FBI is supposed to be investigating. Unless Anita Cuntkeesian is Lex Cuntthor, the FBI should be able to spot the deception.

The time between the news of the threats hitting the internet and the accusations that she's faked it was approximately zero seconds. I saw a thread in a gaming forum where the FIRST POST suggested that she's faking, and for two pages everyone in the forum piled on ridiculous "evidence". That is not my idea of "questioning". That's my idea of a witch hunt.

>>Anita Cuntkeesian is fucking coddled

I think we may also have different definitions of "coddle".
Thunderf00t suspended from twitter, blames Sarkeesian, acts like a total drama queen
09/22/14, 23:34

It's not quite as bad as I thought, but it's plenty bad. Thuinderf00t is claiming that he's got proof that anita was the one who reported him, and his logic is demonstraby wrong, I hope he's being deliberately dishonest, because I hate to think that someone this sloppy is working with nuclear reactors.

More on this later, if the other video gets out of the hopper.
Thunderf00t suspended from twitter, blames Sarkeesian, acts like a total drama queen
09/22/14, 19:30

>>I love yet again how Poetv's SJW double standards shine through. I miss when you guys weren't detestable faggots.

>>If a woman is treated unjustly then it's unfair sexism and she's a victim of the patriarchy, but if a guy gets fucked over and has the NERVE to complain he's acting like a "drama queen".

Really? "Fucked over?" Gosh, DQL you don't seem to know shit about this. That's SO out of character for you!


If you watch the video in the hopper, you'll see a screen cap he got from Twitter. You Tube did this to me, once. It's just standard bolierplate. All this piece of shit has to do to get his account back is certify that he read the rules, and understands them. THAT'S ALL.

This piece of shit literally laughed at the death threats, derisively comparing Anita to Salman Rushdie. But this minor inconvenience? He's playing THAT up like he's in a Wagner Opera about Rosa Parks on 9/11, cause, you know, it's like when Salman Rushdie was forced to say he'd read the Twitter TOS. That was a dark day for humanity...

I could be wrong, but I'm not exaggerating or joking when I say that I think he's going full Colonel Kurtz. He's making this whole volatilize situation about him.

I still find the newer video in the hopper too disturbing to watch all the way through with the sound up, Right now it looks to me like he is convinced that Anita Sarkesian is obsessed WITH HIM. He seems to think she's now harassing him directly. Oh my god.

>>"He needs to go to the middle east, so he can see what REAL censorship looks like!"

>>Anita needs to go to the middle east, so she can see what REAL sexism looks like!

So apparently you think you're zinging me with the anti-feminist cliche (often repeated by Thunderf00t) that I'm mocking. Kind of awkward, isn't it?
Thunderf00t suspended from twitter, blames Sarkeesian, acts like a total drama queen
09/22/14, 10:17

That said, when you're making a contentious argument that stirs up a lot of ill will, there is something to be said for being perfectly explicit.

See, people think there's a "contentious argument" in there, a thesis, a premise, that all these examples are supposed to point to something. "we need to ban games" or "Games make you sexist" This is, of course how everybody does everything on the internet. This is why people think she's being misleading, because she only shows material that supports the presumed "contentious argument"

But what if the point of the images is simply "these images are in there; please see them!

Has anyone seen this article I keep linking to? In the New Statesman?
http://tinyurl.com/m2fabzs

>>There's a common trope of framing Sarkeesian's work as "cherry-picked", as she takes isolated examples from many games and presents them as a stream of misogyny in order to create the illusion that all of these games are entirely misogynist, the entire way through. That's a fundamental misunderstanding of what it is Sarkeesian is doing with TvsWVG, and what cultural criticism in general is. These are tropes - they're fragments of a whole. By definition they don't make up the entirety of a work of art by themselves, but are instead definable cultural touchstones which artists, writers, developers etc, can use when creating a fictional reality.

>>In other words, Anita Sarkeesian only presents sections of games as sexist because she's only talking about the sexist bits of games, and how, of the tropes developers choose to put in their games when designing for female characters, they frequently fall back on sexist ones.

As the quote above about "beloved games and characters" makes clear, she's not even saying that you shouldn't play the games, or that they aren't awesome.

Bort, I'd be a lot more open to criticizing Sarkeesian for how she handled the message if the monkey shit hadn't started flying months before the first video. There was never a moment when she could have finessed this, and she's not exactly all about finesse I've talked to some of these people. They have an agenda to be angry. Whatever you tell them, it makes them angrier.
Thunderf00t suspended from twitter, blames Sarkeesian, acts like a total drama queen
09/22/14, 05:39

I thought we had this discussion. I also like Maud. It's an early episode, she started out with a limited wardrobe and built it up.
Thunderf00t suspended from twitter, blames Sarkeesian, acts like a total drama queen
09/22/14, 03:23

>> I think she lied when told that class she didn't like videos.
Of course, i meant video games.
Thunderf00t suspended from twitter, blames Sarkeesian, acts like a total drama queen
09/22/14, 03:13

Team Anita could do a better job of saying, "we have problems with a lot of games but that doesn't mean we are trying to take GTA away from you".

Here's what she actually says, and she says it more than once. I think the implication is there.

"This series will include critical analysis of many beloved games and characters, but remember that it is both possible (and even necessary) to simultaneously enjoy media while also being critical of its more problematic or pernicious aspects."

Not only is she not trying to ban games, she's making a point of saying that some of the games she's talking about are really good games, and she's totally not telling you to not play them.

I think this is thing about feminist criticism. There's nothing that involves humans that doesn't contain gender singnifiers. If you were to ban everything that's sexist, you'd be throwing out an awful lot of babies with that bath water. It's about redefining and reconciliation.

I think the haters had it backwards with that lecture video. I think she lied when told that class she didn't like videos. I think that, as a feminist, she felt guilty, and was a closet gamer, and Tropes Vs Women is her way of coming out of the closet and working it all out. At lhat makes more sense than an elaborate plot to swindle people out of a 180K while only asking for 6K.
Thunderf00t suspended from twitter, blames Sarkeesian, acts like a total drama queen
09/22/14, 02:49

I'm serious when I ask what other logical conclusion is there to her stance other than outright banning any material you find offensive?

I guess I don't understand the question. Do you think that Roger Ebert was trying to get Rob Schneider movies banned?
Thunderf00t suspended from twitter, blames Sarkeesian, acts like a total drama queen
09/21/14, 23:44

I'm just gonna go ahead and submit the more detailed followup video, and you guys can decide to vote it up or vote it down. I can't get enough of this shit. It's just fascinating. Internet psychopolitics are carrrazzzy! I missed the 4chan civil war over Boxxy. That was a conflict over a child as symbol of the hope for a kinder, gentler internet.. This time, it's literally about toys. It's the perfect symbol of male adolescent immaturity.

It seems extraordinary that Thunderf00t is claiming that he was banned at Anita's behest. I don't think that's necessarily true, but I see that a Voice for Men is already repeating the claim without any documentation at all. They'll believe anything anyone says about her. They leap to conclusions without questioning them, all of them, at once.

In my experience one of the striking characteristics of hardcore misogyny is often an exaggerated perception of a woman's power. During the 4 chan civil war, some participants actually seemed to believe that Boxxy was pulling the strings, directing the newfags who posted her picture all over /b/ as an act of defiance, or something. In realitiy, she was a girl who had made a few videos, appeared in some threads, and watched in horror as the reaction became crazier and more violent. So maybe it's just a natural assumption that anita is behind the banning, where his mind ios bound to go. I need to watch the video again and see what I can find out about the twitter banning process.
Thunderf00t suspended from twitter, blames Sarkeesian, acts like a total drama queen
09/21/14, 20:30

In the other video, he's actually claiming that Sarkeesian directly had him banned. I haven't watched the whole video yet, but I don't see him having any evidence of that, so he may be trying to be as incendiary as possible.

Fuck it. Sooner or later, there's going to be the shitstorm that teaches people that life on the internet is real life. When Boxxy was being harrassed, people just uploaded their stalking crimes and posted them on 4chan. They think it's just a big MMOG, and there are no consequences. Now the FBI is getting involved, so let's just get it over with. In the words my hero, of GWBush, bring it on.

The bomb threat was at the ceremony where Anita received her ambassador award
http://tinyurl.com/nw93z6v
Thunderf00t suspended from twitter, blames Sarkeesian, acts like a total drama queen
09/21/14, 19:39

>>At least he didn't go on for like 10 minutes. But that's probably soon to follow.

>>http://youtu.be/XTSQbLt9DS8

Homer, I think we had this discussion before. I like Maud, too, though I have to believe that either Maud or Pinkie must be adopted.

Catie's wardrobe has built up over time, and that a very early episode. Catie's busy and always moving forward, but if you'd like to see a remastered Maud Pie, you could tweet catie and let her know

@catiewayne
Thunderf00t suspended from twitter, blames Sarkeesian, acts like a total drama queen
09/21/14, 18:14

He needs to go to the middle east, so he can see what REAL censorship looks like!


More details
http://youtu.be/XTSQbLt9DS8

Seeing this fucker described again and again as "a voice of reason" gives me a headache. It turns out that, on the internet, being an atheist lets some people wrap themselves in a cloak of phony baloney "rationality" just as being a christian lets certain people wrap themselves in a cloak of phoney baloney "morality".

I don't know what thunderf00t was doing on twitter, but hate messages to Anita have contained references to his videos, and on one video, he's chuckling condescendingly about the death threats, treating it like a joke because she's not Salman Rushdie. Basically, he's sharing a laugh with the terrorists. Thunderf00t is an irresponsible demagogue.

Now he's claiming that she got him banned directly. I don't think he's got evidence, but I could appear on youtube holding up a Pez dispenser, announce that "This Pez dispenser proves that Anita Sarkeesian kidnapped the Lindbergh Baby", and most of these dipshits would believe me.

If the FBI is really investigating the bomb threats(which has been reported) these people had best expect that the Feds are reading their posts. And they should probably find out what's in the patriot act.
Film audience sees the Phantom Menace trailer c.1998
09/19/14, 21:43

Well, now, I think I agree with Nominal.
Film audience sees the Phantom Menace trailer c.1998
09/19/14, 19:49

http://youtu.be/KF02VoDQSd0
Film audience sees the Phantom Menace trailer c.1998
09/19/14, 19:44

I think the effects made it worth watching if you forget that it's the long awaited return of the most beloved franchise ever. I've never seen anything that reminded me so much of classic sci-fi art. Maybe instead iof "effects", I should praise the art direction.

I picture Lucas impulsively tacking "Episode 5" onto "Empire", at the last minute, before he had much of a script fleshed out for part 1.

I thought that 3 was okay, but none of it was necessary. Seeing the relationships and origin stories that have been evoked by 4-6, acted out illuminated nothing.
Film audience sees the Phantom Menace trailer c.1998
09/19/14, 12:47

A word about the effects. Some of the CGI in 1-3 went beyond technical achievement, and evokes some of the great Sci-Fi magazine covers of the 50s. Okay, now that's out the way.

This was NOT just a case of not living up to the hype. In superhero movies, origin stories tend to be slow and stilted, and this was a three-movie origin story. The whole thing might have been made into one good movie. Of course, the whole trilogy was set in stone from the time that The Empire Strikes Back titles said "Episode V", 20 years earlier. That was where Lucas fucked himself. Making a prequel trilogy that sets up another trilogy and doesn't drag has got to be close to impossible. So we get a lot of pointless shit with 8 year old Annikan.

It wasn't that bad, but for the hardcore fans, it must have been devastating.
Slovenly Neckbeard Whines About Having to Work on his Anti-Sarkeesian Documentary
09/19/14, 07:46

>>Right here on supposedly one of the saner corners of the web, over half the pro-Anita replies are accusing every critic of being lower than pus tea party hate group fedora virgins (an odd insult to use on behalf of a message that women aren't prizes to prove a man's worth)
who need to eat bags of fileted gamer dicks before public execution.

No, we're accusing them of being spoiled, fussy, entitled manbabies who need to grow the fuck up. Nominal, are you so willfully obtuse that you don't see the double standard you apply to this? You're still butthurt over my eat a bag of dicks comment from a week ago, but threats against Anita are really being overstated.

>>She even cherry picks criticism against her. Checking out her official twitter page, roughly half of the negative tweets she gets amount to "People don't hate you because they're misogynist, they hate you because you're dishonest." A third of it amounts to "god you're dumb" or "shut up". Five percent is how she needs a good dicking. Less than that and you finally get to the lazy "get raped and die" comments which I guess she's counting as credible death threats, but I see that posted here at least half a dozen times every time a FOX news pundit says something off putting so I don't see how that's different.

>>Seriously go through all the FOX news clips here and count the number of gang rape wishes on Megyn Kelly and Ann Coulter. You can pass it off as generic internet hate trolling (which I would totally buy), but why does it suddenly become serious business when it happens to some feminist? An antagonizing feminist who uses the exact same misinformation punditry tactics as FOX news.

If you got 5 per cent of the abuse Anita's gotten, you would never stop crying like a fussy baby.
Slovenly Neckbeard Whines About Having to Work on his Anti-Sarkeesian Documentary
09/19/14, 07:32

And the best, too. Like the internet, I guess.

I may have mentioned that my son is a gamer. Besides being transgendered, he's been in a wheelchair most of his life, but in WOW, he's a goddamn monkey.
#GamerGate - Where We Stand
09/19/14, 04:11

They "censored" my comment! HA HAHAHAHAHA!

Previous Next 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228




Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement