| 73Q Music Videos | Vote On Clips | Submit | Login   |
Submitted Videos | Favorited Videos | Voting History | Comment History | Hopper History | Login to Compare
HarrietTubmanPI

Previous Next 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
Comments
Pretty girls make faces
09/03/10, 21:55

AM I PRETTY MAMMA?
Am I a pretty girl, mama?
09/03/10, 07:36

First I thought it was a guy. Then I saw no crotchmount and booberage.

Second, I thought she was a burn victim.

I'm not sure I'm all that satisfied of the reality of what I just saw.
Kodak 1922 Kodachrome Film Test
09/01/10, 21:29

The women in this film were probably around 18-22 years old - so they were all born around 1900 or the turn of the century.

If they were alive today, they'd be about 110 to 114 years old. In other words, they're all dead and they probably died in the 1950s or 1960s.

The youngest girl looks as if she is about 8 - so she would have been born in 1916, and would be 94 if she were alive today.
BUILDING 7 INSIDE JAAB!!
08/31/10, 19:41

The top portion had a lot of mass. It would not have started disintegrating until it ran into the other part of the building.

What you fail to realize is that no matter if it disintegrates or stays together it's going to add a lot of force to the bottom part of the building because it will accelerate for several floors before it runs into a substantial amount of mass.

The energy is there.

Also, the fires could have survived the fall and they could have been ignited once everything collapsed. You had electrical faults, gas lines, etc. that could have started combustion and a lot of fuel and material that was combustible like papers, furniture, etc.
Ricky Gervais on atheism
08/31/10, 14:52

I wish I could give a million stars for his honesty.
Glenn Beck's 'Restoring Honor' Rally - Interviews With Participants
08/31/10, 14:51

Cena, you mean how you said Obama was the one who canceled the Apollo and Energia programs?

Or do you actually have legitimate reasons and not something you just made up and didn't bother to google?
BUILDING 7 INSIDE JAAB!!
08/31/10, 14:34

dancingshadow,

No. It didn't. The steel was never turned into a fine powder. The buildings were not a solid lump of concrete. There was a lot of space in the buildings due to the way it was constructed. There was never molten steel. The fires that were in the rubble that burned for weeks were due to combustible material that was still combustible so it combusted. The steel that was in the building got very hot and weakened considerably due to the heat. Steel does that when it's hot.

The buildings weight plenty enough to create enough kinetic energy to pancake the rest of the buildings and to collapse the entire structure.

The thing is the energy output from the falling buildings did not exceed the gravitational energy contained in the towers. You think they did because you add things that didn't happen - like it 'exploding' or steel being turned into 'a fine dust'.

There was no explosion after the planes hit the buildings. The weight of the top section above the impact could eventually no longer be supported by the structure around the impact.

Are you also going to say they 'feel neatly into their own footprint' like another truther I know? The strange thing with him is that in spite of me showing him an areal photograph of the destruction to show that the buildings' debris fell in a pretty wide area, he still sticks to this claim today.

I don't think the problem is the explanation, dancing. The problem is that you want to believe - evidence be damned.
Holocaust survivor gets verbally beaten at mosque protest
08/30/10, 11:57

I'm not as impressed with Cena anymore. This is the same guy who blamed Obama for the canceling of the Apollo program not one week ago and for the canceling of a soviet rocket in the late 1980s.

He's just not trying anymore.
'Stripper Pole'
08/29/10, 23:40

She's not exactly a lightweight girl.
'Stripper Pole'
08/29/10, 22:20

I think it's a question of weight ratios.
Wendy's Chili song
08/28/10, 10:35

Sarcasm update with baleen.
Asteroid discovery 1980-2010
08/28/10, 10:31

Saturn V ended in 1973. Nobody canceled it. It simply ran out of funding. Nixon was president at the time.

Energia was a Soviet program. It was discontinued around 1990 during the fall of the Soviet Union.

Cena, you are either seriously trolling or just don't want to do any research on anything. I hope it's the former and not the latter.
Wendy's Chili song
08/27/10, 19:50

They're better than they were. They're actually not bad and pretty much the only thing I can stand at Wendy's. They used to have these deli type sandwiches too but they didn't last long because WHO ORDERS SOMETHING THAT ISNT FRIED AND FATTY AT WENDYS RIGHT?
Asteroid discovery 1980-2010
08/27/10, 15:22

Cena, you are an idiot.

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=573725

A one minute search in google would show you why nuking an asteroid is a terrible idea. To sum up, you have to deflect the asteroid, not break it apart. If you break it apart, it has the same energy and will have the same amount of impact.

Second, even if we did need nukes to break them apart, we'd only really need to use it once every few hundred years, if even that. I hardly think reducing our stockpile from 30,000 weapons over the globe to a few hundred or less would prevent us from using them on asteroids.

Yes, an asteroid at least a mile wide or larger is going to strike Earth in the future. However, the odds are that it won't happen for another 100,000 to 10,000,000 years. Instead of a pie in the sky hope of tearing the asteroid apart, our best chances of survival are letting it hit and colonizing Mars and the Moon - which hopefully will happen in the next 250 to 500 years if we make it that long.

Cena, way to troll and turn a nice thread about asteroids and research into a pot-shot at Obama.
Asteroid discovery 1980-2010
08/27/10, 13:50

Incredibly well done animation - although it is misleading. If the dots were truly to scale they wouldn't be visible as a pixel. So, it makes you think there's this solid wall of asteroids in the Asteroid belt (akin to something like the Empire Strikes Back) but it's actually mostly empty. In fact, if you were to send a few thousand deep space probes through it, none of them would hit anything.

The total mass of the Asteroid belt is 4% of the Moon:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002Icar..158...98K

Also, half of that mass is accounted for by only four objects - Ceres, 4 Vesta, 2 Pallas and 10 Hygiea.
Beethoven's 2nd SNES Gameplay
08/27/10, 03:05

Well nobody would recognize Beethoven's 2nd Symphony - much less a bastardization of it.
What would Darwin say to today's creationists?
08/23/10, 10:08

Oh and baleen, they may be creationists and have established fields in science, but they don't use creationism to further science - and most of them end up talking out of both sides of their mouth. They'll go to church and say one thing, then get in the lab and when they're forced to be honest do something completely different. This is why they can publish actual peer-reviewed science but why they have to write popular press books and write blogs to get their creationist viewpoint across.

Most of the creationists are far away from biology anyway - and the ones that even try to do geology or paleontology have rarely, if ever, contributed to science.
What would Darwin say to today's creationists?
08/23/10, 10:05

Now I don't feel so bad for ranting in the burka video. You tried to make me seem irrational, baleen, and here you are equating people who support evolution with people who are trying to kill Palestine.

What's next, throwing in people who support gravity with satan worshipers?
'Muslim Girl takes her burka off'
08/22/10, 13:47

Also, baleen,

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyyoung/100047659/the-burka-ban-damian-green-is-wrong/

This op-ed pretty much sums up my opinion.

Since you are a woman, let's suppose you lived in Iran. You would be forced to marry someone at 14. You would be forced to accept him as a husband. It doesn't matter if he rapes you or abuses you. You become property of the husband.

Not only that, but the largest supporter of this ban, at least in Britain, are MUSLIM WOMEN.

That ought to tell you something.
'Muslim Girl takes her burka off'
08/22/10, 13:41

baleen,

Why don't you go and talk to women who were oppressed by Islam and then went away from the religion (and subsequently their families, their social status - if any at all - etc.) and were blacklisted because they spoke out? Or worse, stoned, or raped, or executed?

Oh yeah, you can't talk to the dead. But, I have talked to women who have converted away from Islam and you'd be surprised by the thoughts that are hidden away and repressed due to abject fear and sexism.

It's kind of strange how the people in the west often criticize Mormonism or even Scientology for doing less, yet when people 10,000 or more km away do even worse in the name of religion we think nothing of it. True, stoning, torture, murder in the name of the church, etc. has happened in Christianity, but not sanctioned by the church for a very long time. Yet, there are sects of Islam which are perfectly fine with rape or torture or stoning if a man or Imam does it in the name of Allah.

I'm not advocating unfair treatment of people who are from the middle east. What I'm advocating is a bias against the behavior of sexist and irrational culture for what it is when it concerns the oppression of other people.

I suppose human rights violations are less important than 'freedom of religious expression'.

If they want to wear a burka or fancy hat or a fez or whatever, sure, that's your choice. But, when you talk to 99% of these women, it is not their choice. Society, men, and religious leaders made that choice for them and they are too afraid and fearful to go otherwise.

Previous Next 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89




Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement