pastorofmuppets
| |
| Previous Next 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 |
| Comments |
fastest 'full contact' 'martial arts' punches
12/29/09, 00:46 Related video: heaviest car balanced on the head. Not "a" car, "heaviest" car. |
 |
Chris-Chan's holiday message to Jack Thaddeus: I'll break you dead!
12/28/09, 22:19 Christian apologized for the skipped audio, give him a break. He would try to imitate what people do when they're angry in crystal clear surround sound if he could. |
 |
A Jetson Christmas Carol (1985)
12/28/09, 04:15 Oh yeah, multi-part wasn't working for me.
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vp4h8L9KgIo
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_S6LA6ehPY |
 |
Why We Believe In Gods
12/28/09, 03:09 baleen: I was referring to naturalism. Like it says in the WP article, there are a couple of implications...epistemological ("everything we can know exists in nature") and ontological angle ("everything that exists, exists in nature"). It's the latter view that most often gets called reductionist.
Thing is though, even ignoring that, you still have to acknowledge that our brains evolved along lines that made religious experience possible, because if they didn't, religious experience wouldn't be physically possible. If language didn't have some survival benefit, we wouldn't have the physical capacity for it. Or so I have always imagined. |
 |
A Jetson Christmas Carol (1985)
12/28/09, 02:47 ah crap, morlocks |
 |
A Jetson Christmas Carol (1985)
12/28/09, 02:46 The Eloi live down there. |
 |
Three-Way Tie on Jeopardy
12/26/09, 17:40 His face on that first total. |
 |
A Jetson Christmas Carol (1985)
12/26/09, 17:29 Maybe it was because I saw this at the right age, but I still think this is a really good adaptation of A Christmas Carol.
I didn't unwrap this tape...it was sitting on the tailgate of a Power Wheels. Good fucking Christmas. |
 |
The Eyelids of an Asian Woman
12/26/09, 02:15 Is it the hips? No. Hair? No. Boobs?
Well what do you think, smart guy? |
 |
Rape-aXe Anti-Rape Device
12/26/09, 02:08 GOOD CALL |
 |
Rape-aXe Anti-Rape Device
12/26/09, 02:07 That was my favorite part too, short of the photos at the end proving that this person is actually making these things and running them through QC tests. |
 |
Why We Believe In Gods
12/26/09, 02:01 Who believes in dogs? That's a loaded question. |
 |
Why We Believe In Gods
12/26/09, 01:46 I guess you dislike the idea that everything, including consciousness, can be explained in terms of physical processes. I'll give you that it's a tough one. And it's beyond the scope of this lecture.
Even leaving that aside, religion must have arisen naturally, unless you believe that God gave/taught it to humans. But it's not crazy to think that maybe we a capacity for it, as we do for language. So why do we have that capacity?
You might say that it confers an advantage for survival. Or you might say it's an emergent side effect of other thought process which do that. Dr. Thompson is in the latter camp, but the neat thing is that he has put a lot of thought into which psychological processes support which aspects of religious experience.
If you are yourself religious then I could see where neither idea sounds very appealing, and maybe Thompson's stuff seems overly reductionist. Not to keep repeating myself but I don't really consider this stuff empirical science anyway. But there's something about it which stuck with me. I guess because I'd never heard the hyperactive agency detection thing before. |
 |
5 second films: Naughty
12/26/09, 00:44 Yeah but it's measure twice, cut once. |
 |
Why We Believe In Gods
12/25/09, 03:23 And you commented on the other one...weird. I smell a conspiracy.
The intros end around 2:35, btw. |
 |
Why We Believe In Gods
12/25/09, 03:20 dupe.
http://www.poetv.com/video.php?vid=58261
still great though. if you missed it the first time around, watch it.
(He says something about empirical evidence in the beginning...they don't that. But it's still a really good look at how certain elements of our psychology might make gods a really natural idea.) |
 |
Laura Ingraham vs. Devout Atheist
12/25/09, 03:12 Nope. I think they're looking for money.
Which I think is a good counter to the "atheism is a religion" thing. Religions disappear without money. Atheism doesn't disappear until someone tells you you don't have to actually deal with how harsh life is. |
 |
Laura Ingraham vs. Devout Atheist
12/25/09, 02:58 That's exactly what makes her more evil for me. You can just imagine the folks at home saying "yeah, that's what I wanna know too" at the TV after every "question." |
 |
Laura Ingraham vs. Devout Atheist
12/24/09, 16:21 "Reason is always in season." I like it. She actually didn't do that bad a job. Fuck Ingraham for saying that atheists don't do charity. I *only* donate to secular charities (all the big ones are anyway) because I'll be damned if my money's going to go to indoctrinate the weak rather than the stuff I meant it to go to. |
 |
Laura Ingraham vs. Devout Atheist
12/24/09, 16:16 If asked to do so, I would not be against taking up arms in the culture war. |
 |