|SolRo - 2011-09-30 |
DancingShadow reply generator;
If you just think about it, you would know he's wrong.
I cannot understand how WTC 7 could collapse like that so it must have been taken down by controlled demolition. I don't need to supply evidence of it or anything else that supports this thesis, it is immutable fact.
THA SUGAH RAIN
Dude they openly admitted wtc7 was a controlled demolition. Its not a conspiracy theory.
|wtf japan - 2011-09-30 |
Fact: Baleen does not like self-loathing Jews. No matter what they're saying.
|Abstract Fainter - 2011-09-30 |
Obviously Chomsky knows nothing of buses or bus physics.
|decoy - 2011-09-30 |
Chomsky is a controlled asset of the NWO.
|dancingshadow - 2011-10-01 |
Well, I loves me some gnoame so this was a sad video for me when I saw it a killion years ago.
I'll just paraphrase this old man.
0 - 2:00: terror. violence, china, indonesia, terror. violence, stuff..
"did they plan it
this is extreemly unlikely .. they were insane.. it would have leaked.. secrets are hard to keep... it would have leaked out... they would have been shot... they wouldn't take a chance.. The plane totally could have missed... you can hardly control.. .it would have leaked.. .to take the chance.. it would have leakeced.... the left.... something something
anyone who knows anything about science... .would instantly discould that evidence. plenty of coincidences and phynomina.. but even when you do controlled experiments... they don't know everything... I mena /// look at the letters they get..."
All sorts of things that happan... and afterwords you can put them in some other patern... and you and put them in other patterns... Thats just how complicated events are.
So the evidence that has been produced is WORTHLESS !!!...
So the beliefe that that could have been done is wrong.
And then he says.. "Even if it were true... *mumbles* it's of very little signifigance."
Again... it's fascinating to see otherwise intelegent mind crumble when smashed with the hammer of a larger world
tl:dr: Still got no proof whatsoever aside from a "what if?"
Ah.. whoops... That was my scratch pad, I hit submit by accident.
You can probably still follow along if you start at 2:15.
This topic makes smart people say stupid things :)
and makes stupid people think they know something
5:55: "Even if it were true... who cares?"
Look at this horrible sentence.
Do you want to be a person that says that....
You could be that person. You could work for me. I'll keep you content... it'll be so smooth and soft. Everywhere you look, there'll be 5 lights.
It's especially sad when he talks about the letters to Nature around 4:27.
"The letters are commonly about unexplained properties of reports of technical experiments..." seriously... watch him stutter out this sad sentence.
I read Nature every week. The letters section is by far the most specific and technical. It's usually about genetics. I don't understand most of it.
It always amazes me when stupid people willingly admit they are just borderline above full on retard and that smart people know a shit-ton more than them, but in the next sentence dismiss everything that smart people have a consensus about just because "common sense".
Now, maybe in your stupidity you don't know what common sense is, so i'll have to explain it to you;
Common sense is not to leave your wallet on the dashboard of your car when parking it on the street overnight.
Common sense has NOTHING ---at all--- to do with applying your extensive knowledge of holywood action movies to the collapse of a building, much less one with a very unconventional structure.
You really are an excellent troll. The Nature bit was over the top, but otherwise: solid performance. 4/5.
Yeah, like Dirt, I have to give big ups for the terrific trolling. The bit about how intelligent Chomsky is and yet is amazingly stupid on this one particular thing is a piece of beauty.
|zerobackup - 2011-10-01 |
Really though, Saddam is dead, Osama (whether he did or did not mastermind this) is nowhere to be seen, it was fucking 10 years ago and we are still at war WHO GIVES A FUCK ANYMORE.
Yes, they definitely shot a bearded man and dumped him in the ocean before anyone could get a look at the body.
seems that by that statement you give a fuck still.
Oh good, it's another one.
|Corpus Delectable - 2011-10-01 |
Five because dancingshadow is insane, and the stars will get under his/her skin.
|Aelric - 2011-10-01 |
He seems like a cunning linguist.
|Gommorrah - 2011-10-01 |
911 truthers are pathetic cowards. if you believe the government did such a thing why didnt you attempt to assassinate bush instead of whining about it with a bunch of schizoids on the internet
Did you really just ask why I didn't kill a man because of my beliefs?
To all the other posters: "Thank you for not being THIS fucking stupid"
|John Holmes Motherfucker - 2014-07-16 |
"Sheer Logic" is not how i would describe Chomsky's linguistic theories.
It's kind of impressive that I spent two whole semesters in 1987-88 wrestling with Chomsky's Transformational Grammar theory, and never knew that he was associated with politics.
When I finally did grasp the concept, it was one of the most satisfying triumphs of my college years. And then, I promptly forgot all of it. In fact, if not for google, I wouldn''t even remember what it was called.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|