The difference is one of them is right.

-1 because this is so very, very old.

Savage is not a "douche" and it matters because Perkins was once an elected official, and is currently in an active, lobbying, think-tank. He's in a position where he can work towards and, god forbid, succeed in taking away the rights of certain u.s. citizens. Why would you play this down? Does he literally have to sit on a throne of gay people's skulls for him to be reprehensible?

First amendment -- needs a second draft?

Yes it does, fuck him and all who endorse him, there's plenty of humans without you.

Fuck you.

dude the guy encourages parents of gay kids to disown them. Fuck you fuck you fuck you.

Go back to reddit, you filth.

I'm a bad guy because I don't care what gay people do with other consenting adults and think zealots of any kind are really all the same.

Adorable.

Yah Dan Savage is such a zealot for gay people being human beings with rights maybe he should cool down and stop being so uppity.

It's cool though because you theoretically support gay rights, just not their ability to talk about it or fight back against people taking them away.

Filth.

No, I don't support gay rights. I support human rights because I don't care who people fuck as long as it is consenting adults.

Oh, look how filthy I am with all my "everyone should be treated equally" rhetoric.

Ass.