Blue - 2013-01-17
I love it how the police will preemtively break into somebody's house to arrest them to prevent a peaceful protest but you can just carry a gun around in protest and that doesn't get you unlawfully detained.
|
Cena_mark - 2013-01-17 They don't fear resistance from peaceful protesters.
|
misterbuns - 2013-01-17 That was the premise of Blue's post, not a response to it.
|
Oscar Wildcat - 2013-01-17 While I acknowledge the validity of the argument, in this case it's more that the police roundly agree with the boys and are shielding them from correction. It's the region.
This bothered me at first, but I feel now that if the police want to be bullet sponges, who am I to get in their way? I mean, who do you think is gonna be at the other end of that gun, officer friendly? I'm not the one who has to go out on call when the town gets shot up.
|
Oscar Wildcat - 2013-01-17 ...and as if by magic, this story just popped up.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/17/recreational-assault-wea pons-fire-riddles-ohio-home-narrowly-misses-officer/
|
Cena_mark  - 2013-01-17
My idea for gun control is to have everyone who has been spamming up Facebook with inane gun propaganda lose their gun owning privileges.
|
misterbuns - 2013-01-17 It's not all bad. Because of the gun paranoia I've learned that a few of my old friends have been NWO truthers who I have been able to reconnect with and prosthelytize the many benefits of being a shill for the Opus Dei and the Archons of the Draconis system. If you think Jackie Onassis was hot wait till you get a load of her with her exoskeleton off. Rrrowwrr.
|
TeenerTot - 2013-01-17
Logic tells me that not all gun owners are douchebags like this. But every time some gun nut pulls a stunt like like this, I get less sympathetic to normal people's gun rights.
|
The Mothership - 2013-01-17
The underlying attitude here is one of confrontation and intimidation. They want people to come up to them - while they are armed - and start an argument. Their hope seems to be that they can change some peacenik's mind by demonstrating how they really aren't threatening, when that is exactly how most people see them. Whatever one's position on guns, these idiots are not helping.
|
Old_Zircon - 2013-01-17
-1 for making me visit Huffington Post.
|
Old_Zircon - 2013-01-17 Probably needs a "Portland" tag.
|
Hooker - 2013-01-17
The video I submitted a while back of a guy masturbating in a library loudly protesting, "It's my freedom" always comes to mind in situations like this. These guys are equivalent to people who write kiddy sex fiction just to test everyone's patience with free speech.
|
Gmork - 2013-01-17
Oh, come on - you can do better than this.
|
Rudy - 2013-01-17 Yeah, I'm getting a server error too.
|
Gmork - 2013-01-17 I was referring to the submission atrocities.
|
sosage - 2013-01-17
Stating the obvious: How is anyone supposed to differentiate these people with someone looking to mow down people in down town pleasantburg?
|
Bort - 2013-01-17
Well obviously, when a gunman shows up, you'll be able to recognize them as the guys trying to shoot the gunman.
|
Bort - 2013-01-17 Shoulda been a response to sosage. I am abashed.
|
pyslexic dharmacist - 2014-01-05
"What they really should do is observe the person to determine if the person is aggressive," Drouin said. "We're not doing anything threatening to anyone."
YOU'RE CARRYING A FUCKING ASSAULT RIFLE. THEY'RE NOT OFTEN WORN AS ACCESSORIES.
|
| Register or login To Post a Comment |
