I don't even need to watch this, this whole situation was so wrong on so many levels. stars for evil.

Um, you do know this is a fundie propaganda movie and that almost everything in it is either exaggerated or completely made up, yes?
Whatever you think of Kinsey or his work, this movie is bullshit. Try reading a real book about him, not a weird OMG OUR CULTURE IS A CESSPOOL over-reactionary piece of garbage that gets most of its press on InfoWars and PrisonPlanet.

This is some Ron Paul shit right here.

American History Films - unknown

Executive producers Joseph M Schimmel and Christian J Pinto aka Pastor Joe Schimmel and Chris Pinto.

Both associated with Adullam Films (an easy google).

Significant quoting of Judith Reisman, who has an entry on wikipedia worth quoting:

"Reisman has postulated a physical mechanism to account for the dangers she ascribes to pornography: when viewed, an addictive mixture of chemicals which she has dubbed "erototoxins," floods the brain, causing harmful influences to it."

George Washington has traveled through time to the present day with one purpose: to look concerned and stare at empty swingsets. Swingsets emptied by Obama's army of Kinsey-loving pedos.

This documentary is complete garbage but the first five minutes or so are hilarious.

Yam scrabblin cocoa pops ! Done no reasearch but im had me a drank!

I didn't vote this up in the hopper because I couldn't tell if it was being submitted in earnest by a moron. I guess that was the case. Maybe someone could submit a version with better tags and descriptions.

The Youtube comments are worrisome.

How, within the first three minutes, did the submitter not realize what is going on here?

Despite clearly being garbage, just the quality of this thing is beyond reprehensible.

Come on, poesters! It's nearly three hours of fundies talking about child abuse! That's a textbook "five for evil"! And Species may be an idiot, but that's no reason to resort to ad hominem. Society progresses through free and open exchange within the marketplace of ideas; any idea, no matter how stupid, deserves the opportunity to be heard, and in refuting it we can only grow stronger. With that in mind, I'll address the first few points raised in the video (since I haven't had time to watch the whole thing).

The Kinsey-Nazi Connection: this is true, at least in the sense that Kinsey worked with a former Nazi. He had at least one professional exchange with a Nazi pedophile; however, there is NO evidence that he "encouraged" Herr Kiddiddler's proclivities, and their relationship seems to have been limited to an unsolicited letter or two. The fact that the Kiddiddler was a Nazi is no more relevant than the fact that the filmmakers are Christian, and in the abscence of any proof that Kinsey condoned or encouraged this man's abuse behavior, I fail to see why I (a member of "the public") should care about this revelation.

The Founding Fathers were Xtians: this is also true, although grossly misleading when invoked in modern political discussions. The Founding Fathers were (mostly) deists, even *gasp* Freemasons (and we all know how anti-Christian those Masons are!) They would be no more at home with the modern "Christian" right than they would be with the modern "Socialist" left. The idea that morality cannot (or perhaps, should not) exist without a Prime Mover to define and legitimize these laws is, I admit, somewhat more troubling, and too complicated to get into properly here (for the record, I am not a Christian, and I tend to suscribe to the sociobiological school of thought), although for this to worry us in the way in which the filmmakers wish to imply, we must accept that not only does a morality-defining God exist, but that these morals are accurately described in the Bible, that the moral laws specifically surrounding sexual behavior are both accurately interpretted and still valid within the context of Christ's "New Covenant", AND that it should be the duty of the temporal state to enforce and police these laws. Not, you know, the duty of God, or the informal "community", or even the individual and his own conscience ("personal responsibility" doesn't just mean you shouldn't ask da gubmint for handouts).

If You Watch Porn, You Act it Out: this claim is patently absurd. There have been MANY scientific studies done on the effects of pornography, and the truth appears to be quite the opposite (particularly in the case of "extreme taboo acts", like pedophilia). I'd also like to point out that this claim, if true, would mean that porn addicts have wild and exciting sex lives; one need only meet a porn addict to see that this is not the case, and frankly, it'd be a miracle if any of them got laid at all.