|Toenails - 2013-05-05 |
Video proof that Perry would shoot black people if given half the chance.
|Riskbreaker - 2013-05-05 |
"bad ass", lol
|kingarthur - 2013-05-05 |
I keep hearing how Houston is a big international melting pot now, but I gotta tell ya I'm skeptical.
|Jet Bin Fever - 2013-05-05 |
YEAH! Fuck Texas. Fuck this guy especially.
|SteamPoweredKleenex - 2013-05-05 |
And he'll use those super-gun powers to take out any attempts at regulating fertilizer plants in Texas, and he'll shoot anyone who questions his cuts to fire department budgets. Yee-haw!
|chumbucket - 2013-05-05 |
The reload slo mo. He can take his time because I'm sure it holds more than 10 rounds.
A fun little tidbit. The NRA likes to style themselves as "gun safety" people and advocates of responsible gun ownership in order to dodge too much of the "cowboy gun nut" stigma. You know you are dealing with a real gun person when they go to excessive lengths to demonstrate hearing and eye protection, as well as barrel, and trigger finger discipline. Hence the slow mo.
So nobody on earth actually cares about gun control. 100% of hearing protection is to "avoid the cowboy gun nut stigmata"
The more I listen to a choice few of you, the more I realize you do the exact same thing religious fundamentalists do - ignore reality in favor of sounding (what you believe to be) clever. Seriously Ragga, if you actually believe what you said 100% then you're a pretty worthless individual.
gun control = safety, although theyre in the same hemisphere
That's right, Gmork. We mock hearing protection as it's the only potential punishment gun nuts will receive for their deliberate decision that massacres are worth having no restrictions whatsoever on gun ownership or the purchase of guns.
You caught us. Well done you.
We aren't Somalia, SPK. Existing laws provide significant restrictions on gun ownership and the purchase of guns. Are they complete / enough? Probably not, but to claim there are *no* restrictions is simply idiotic.
How about "no effective restrictions?" The loopholes, especially on conceal-carry (all states must honor them, you can get a license over the 'net for Virginia, so you can get one for all CC states without even showing your face to another human being): http://www.concealed-carry.net/
The "handgun" used at Fort Hood is capable of using rounds that can blast through armor, and its use at a MILITARY BASE kind of demonstrates how even those trained to be under fire don't have much of a chance against an assailant thusly armed. Nearly every gun made available for the military (let me say again, the MILITARY) is made available for civilian purchase even though the need for such guns is pretty much nil. That is, you're not going to hold off an army with it, much less the U.S. military, for obvious reasons. It's to make money for the gun manufacturers, and who cares about the resulting fallout from having so many of these weapons out there and available?
Is there a limit to the arsenal I can have? No.
Is there a limit to the types of guns I can have? Very, very few.
Are there requirements for me to show competence and responsibility that is even remotely similar to that needed to get a driver's license? Hell, no.
You have, what, a short waiting period (assuming you don't just buy your gun in a Gun Show parking lot) and maybe a delay as you find a stocked ammo dealer (because the nuts are yelling "Obama's a-comin'! Buy them bullets!"), and that's without anyone making sure you're taking your meds.
Another look at the "restrictions" on guns. It turns out about 50 registered sex offenders in Iowa were able to obtain gun permits:
It's a funny ol' world, isn't it?
|Raggamuffin - 2013-05-05 |
The targets are all the size of small children.
|Old People - 2013-05-05 |
The shooting he's doing there is much easier than it looks.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|