I guess Sony has to keep putting them out so they don't lose the rights. This one looks more like a Sinister Six approach than Spiderman 2's (mostly) Dr. Octagon approach. It might be OK.

ugh.. I take it back, as one of the related videos is a trailer for "Need for Speed" starring the guy from Breaking Bad. I feel like movies are getting so bad and unimaginative that they should just change the "let's all go to the lobby" song to "let's all go to boxoffice and get our money back before the trailers are finished and go play outside instead." Catchy.

Wow that's a totally unique sentiment and not something that people have been saying about every art form ever since civilization began

WHO WANTS DESSERT really likes this movie, and it's totally not just an act he's pulling.

Spirit stars for the image in my head of a half raw/half charred rabbit on a stick, some roots, a few acorns, and a hollowed rock of dirty water dancing by grunting cheerfully before everyone looks at a cave painting.

These movies seem to be based a little more on the "Ultimate" comics, in which Rhino has a robotic suit, Doc Oc works for OsCorp, etc. But there are still a lot of differences, I'm sure.

Also this looks joyless and dumb. Like the first one.

The first first one, or the other first?

The first first one was pretty enjoyable, really. The most recent first one.. ugh.

No R rated movies with marvel characters now that disney owns them.

But Warner is still cool with doing a Lobo movie, right?

I'm not cool with Warner doing a Lobo movie, that's one of the few of those comic book things you kids love that I actually like.

Unless Terry Gilliam makes it.

If a Lobo movie comes out, it will undoubtedly be based on the New 52 version of Lobo which they basically turned into the DC version of Deadpool for much RANDOM LOLs, so don't worry it'll suck tons.

Is it any worse than "We can never be together" from the Raimi trilogy? Peter, dude, as long as you're selling Spider Man pictures, people are going to go after Mary Jane anyway. What difference does it make if you're boning or not? Come to think of it, why are you still selling pictures if it puts the people you know in way more danger than any amount of fucking since it connects Spider Man to Peter Parker? Come to think of that, why are you still selling the hottest pictures in town to the Daily Bugle for peanuts? Is there only one newspaper in New York City?

Dude

Andrew Garfield is the worst fucking Spider-Man. He's the physical embodiment of Hollywood Nerdy: A hot male model with great hair who kind of slightly stutters sometimes and owns a laptop.

The live action parts look faker than the fake-looking CGI parts.

The only casting decision I approve of is Emma Stone, because Emma Stone.

To me, Sally Field is still like a box of chocolates.

Was Spiderman 3 the one with Thomas Haden Church as Sandman? Who said that was bad?

I do love how, with nerds losing their shit over how Disney is handling the Avengers so well and Fox is taking X-Men in interesting directions, Marvel's bread and butter superhero is getting absolutely destroyed by Sony.

Every Nolan Batman movie had 3 villains. Sometimes even more.