If that's how we define "scientific," can we define everything "natural" as acting like cyanide or botulism?
THIS MESSAGE BROUGHT TO YOU BY MAGIC.
WHAT HAS SCIENCE DONE
If only we could stop science, undo all the horrors it has caused, and go back to that golden age of peace and prosperity: the Stone Age.
|Born in the RSR |
What have the Romans ever done for us?
|Oscar Wildcat |
Don't fuck with SCIENCE.
|The God of Biscuits |
"Subtitle Text Here"
You keep using that word, i don't think it means what you think it means...
|infinite zest |
Sheesh. Putting up a video warning of the advancements of science and technology on a site like youtube, which, really hasn't become ubiquitous enough for anyone to have their soap box until the last couple of years is one of the more hypocritical things I've ever seen. Plus robots and cyberspace are cool. Getting shot by a terminator or getting bombed.. not so much. Organized religion's music and art? That's cool. The crusades and Westboro? ... not so much.
I won't deny that I think that Monsanto, forced flouride in the water supply or drones are good either. But the very means of communication on which he's postulating his argument are the same ones that will eventually become self-aware and kill us all. At least the Christians got that part right: repent and when Jesus comes to kill you, it won't be so bad.
|Juice Eggs McKenna |
Where's Mengele? An obvious example of atrocity committed in the name of science as opposed to war and/or profit.
So your rebuttal is "Yeah, but NAZIS!!!"
Stay classy, internet guy.
I don't think that was a rebuttal. I think it was a "why didn't he include Mengele if his premise is that science = atrocities," as Mengele's experiments were notoriously inhumane.
|Syd Midnight |
NaturalNews.com is valuable in that you can immediately stop reading anything that links to it and safely assume the writer is an idiot
|Jet Bin Fever |
Would we have Mad Scientists without science? I think not!
| Register or login To Post a Comment|