| 73Q Music Videos | Vote On Clips | Submit | Login   |

Reddit Digg Stumble Facebook
Desc:The 'Why Blacks Fail' guy explains why he supports a return to monarchy.
Category:Educational, Military
Tags:read the comments, Aurini, monarchy, Frankfurt School, Gen-X
Submitted:EvilHomer
Date:07/05/14
Views:1125
Rating:
View Ratings
Register to vote for this video

People Who Liked This Video Also Liked:
the ultimate golf lesson
California Games (c64) - Easter Egg
Tithe Rap
House of Crazies (1972 TV Spot)
Glide 2
Homosexuality, God and the Illuminati Reptilians - The Truth About the Gays
Journalist frolics with Antarctican seals
Is there something you'd like to share with the rest of us Amazing Larry?!
Pamela Gorman 2010 (Arizona Candidate)
Don't be alarmed when your Chef's Selection meal starts to sing.
Comment count is 13
Raggamuffin
Is he saying he wants the country to be run by the Queen of England, or does he mean that he wants to be the King of Canada himself?
Oscar Wildcat
Oh this asshole again. Haven't you people had enough of him yet?
EvilHomer
Twenty minutes of Mr Aurini may be a bit much for you to take, so if you've got better things to do and you're looking for the CliffsNote summary of this rant: no, he doesn't really get to the point. The bulk of this video is tangential rambling that sounds like it might eventually tie in to the core argument but never winds up doing so, punctuated by slow cigarette drags and smoldering, not-at-all-gay "Come Hither" looks.

However, he does say some rather telling things starting at 7:30, picking up speed at 8:15, and reaching crescendo at 8:55; simply replace "we" with "I", and I think that little section gets straight to the heart of who he is, and why.

It's a little tragic when you think about it like that, actually. I feel bad for the poor guy. :(
memedumpster
He almost admitted he was a stupid stupid stupid (this word cannot be typed enough times in a Plan 9 From Outer Space style admonition to really get my point across) stupid man.

cognitivedissonance
Devil's advocate: returning to a monarchy could potentially be a good idea as it removes the moral responsibility for a failed society from the victims themselves. It's all well and good to say Richard III was a bad king and the kingdom suffered, because it was a single man's corruption instead of an entire culture's failure to commit to enlightened self-rule. We can damn the villain, but we can't seem to ever admit that our inability to deserve democracy damns us to our own choices.

But then again, I believe in absolutely nothing I just typed, just a thought bubble.
Miss Henson's 6th grade class
Frankly, I wouldn't mind seeing a King of America when I hear truthers go on and on about how Obama isn't a real American and Democrats don't love their country. We've pretty much been using Presidential families as de-facto royal families for a while now, and it wrecks and sours our politics. I get the impression that countries with royal figureheads don't have this problem because they've always got a ready-made answer to the question, "who represents us?" Its useful to have a person to serve as a repository for these feelings while ordinary, boring people take care of the business of government.

cognitivedissonance
In a way, corporate America should really just do this for us. Pick somebody, make them a royal, do it completely outside of the electoral process, and let them handle everything. It would solve so many problems. The trick is actually picking the right person, since so far the people they choose to make celebrities are all awful. George Clooney would be a good choice.

Miss Henson's 6th grade class
Well, celebrities are the other group of people that represent "us." When I had a roommate who read "People," I was always really surprised by the informality with which magazines like that discuss their subjects. It's like they're neighbors, but special.

Since kings are necessarily attached to states, I think having corporate America doing the choosing would sort of be a non starter. But I'd be down with king George I.

StanleyPain
This is the kind of douchebag who would get involved with the Church of Satan "ironically" and then be thoroughly shamed by its members.
cognitivedissonance
When I was 21, I wanted to do something to really shock my father. I figured that my choice was between the Communist Party USA and the Church of Satan. The Communist Party membership was free, whereas the Church of Satan was a 0 fee, so I went with Communism and thus got my FBI file. Hooray!

Xenocide
I didn't have my sound on when I began playing this video. Then the guy showed up on screen. I've finally stopped laughing. I haven't listened to a single word. Five stars.
John Holmes Motherfucker
The thinking man's Dillon the Hacker. Listening to this guy talk about Anita Sarkeesian, he's obviously trolling, and he's actually hilarious, and yet I can still feel the bile rising to fill the space behind my eyeballs.

I can ONLY watch him with the sound down, which, once upon a time, was the only way I could watch Boxxy.

Jet Bin Fever
This fucking guy.
Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement