Edited? Or is this an actual function of the eye? Kinda creepy.
it's just her retinas having a spasm. it causes her irises to retract. no big deal. yours do it, too. #bernieorbust
not as creepy as burnie bros
I think it's fake. You could do five frames with a clone brush to get that effect. They look like slits taller than they are wide, which I don't think can happen naturally. It's hard to tell, since the most aggravating post-production since the CBGB movie wrecks the video pretty hard.
What's a Bernie? Aren't we in the real deal now where Trump's going to win? The military knows what's up.
Could you get your faggoty anti-bernie sentiment off this completely unrelated video? Thanks. I'd rather poetv not emulate youtube.
Oh, you're right, Military Times didn't even ask them, what dicks!
Did you even see CBGB? It will make you appreciate the original Hulk gimmick more.
Gmork - "faggoty". As a Bern-bro yourself, I expected less SQW, more SJW from you.
Meme -I did not see CBGB. And the Coasties technically aren't military, they're Stasi, part of Homeland Security. They're probably going to vote for Trump, too, seeing as beating up immigrants and running protection rackets against foreign-made goods accounts for like 95% of their job.
What I like best about that chart is how honest the wording is. "Would not vote"!
Oh look, EH exhibiting double standards! What a shocker.
Stop being a faggot.
Homie, Alan Rickman plays a completely lovable loser in it, surrounded by kids who can't act. I really enjoyed it.
You know, between us faggots.
Why should I stop being a faggot, Gmork? Is there something *wrong* with being a faggot? Evidently you think there is. Explain this to me.
And at any rate, I am not a faggot, I am an MFM trans-trans lesbian. That is to say, I am an FtM transexual Lesbian Soul trapped in the body of a straight man.
EH ~ willing to ignore other peoples' colloquial use of the word, but not when it comes to people he's actively trolling.
Not to mention the blatant hypocrisy of using blanket dismissive terms like SJW and burnie-bro and in the same breath telling someone else not to use blanket terms. Except in this case the use of "faggot" had zero sexual connotation. EH knows this, but will of course choose to be obtuse because intellectual dishonesty comes easily to him.
So now you're saying that the terms "faggoty", "Bernbro". and "SJW" are dismissive - because evidently, YOU dismiss such people out of hand.
I can only speak for myself, but I'm never "dismissive" of anyone, regardless of what labels might be applied to them. I like to take people seriously; even transphobic gun-nut SQWs like yourself...!
This is why gay people shouldn't vote for Hillary. Her supporters are straight up Reaganesque bigots towards gay people.
Unless you're just a filthy Jew, Gmork, and I say that with no ethnic, religious, or bigoted historical context, making my bigoted slur a blameless holy word of justifiable disapproval.
"So now you're saying that the terms "faggoty", "Bernbro". and "SJW" are dismissive - because evidently, YOU dismiss such people out of hand."
No, I'm not. Faggoty is also not on the list. You use the terms "SJW/Bernbro" unironically, which is obvious. You also ignore when others use slurs in REAL context (such as your refusal to call orcs out on his GENUINE homophobia, and instead focus on completely whimsical and non-serious Louis-CK usage of the word "faggot").
If you can't see how that's being intellectually dishonest, you're again being intellectually dishonest. I refuse to believe you're that stupid. Because you're not. You're just intentionally trolling someone and ignoring the (glaring) faults of people who actually deserve it, like orcs. It's pretty blatant and obvious.
"I can only speak for myself, but I'm never "dismissive" of anyone"
Except me, of course. When it suits you. And when you're called on it, you simply do exactly what you've done - deny that those were your intentions.
But if you're able to deny that those were your intentions, why aren't you actually listening to me when I say my use of "faggoty" was for comedic impact and not genuine, like orcs ACTUAL hatred of homosexuals?
I point again to your intellectual dishonesty. Intentionally being obtuse.
Meme, if you want to get a reaction out of me you're going to have to troll much harder. EH has you beaten by several orders of magnitude.
Why wouldn't I use those terms "unironically"? What does it even MEAN to "use such terms ironically"? Unlike you, I do not dismiss people based upon their worldviews (this includes both New Orcs and yourself); when I use a sociological term, it's used clinically, and without moral judgement. It's perfectly natural for this to be done unironically - how could it be otherwise...?
And what's wrong with being a Bernbro?! I thought YOU were a Bernbro...? I must admit, I haven't checked my notes for your position on the Democratic Civil War lately, so if I have mischaracterized you, I apologize. And yes, being a homophobic SQW is perfectly in keeping with being a Hill-hag, so if you ARE a Hill-hag, then belay my prior, carry on.
do y'all think the Reptilians are mounting an anti-faggot jihad kicking off in orlando this weekend? 50 faggots confirmed dead, with many others maimed
Mischaracterized is an understatement, EH. Most of the time it feels like you just proclaim me this or that to fit whatever narrative you're trying to create, regardless of my actual position. This isn't a new thing.
Just now, you implied I was a "homophobic SQW". I'm neither of those things.
Not to mention the blatant lies you made up about "copping to multiple accounts". Literally just so you could give orcs something to feel falsely justified about.
You pretend you're being impartial and clinical, but you're actually the biggest troll on this entire site.
>> You pretend you're being impartial and clinical, but you're actually the biggest troll on this entire site.
I don't see how those two things are mutually exclusive, Gmork. Sometimes, particularly when faced with bigots and right-wing ideologues, the easiest way to "troll" is simply to be impartial and clinical.
It is not my purpose, but yes, now that mention it: reasonableness drives homophobes insane!
Orcs - possibly. Reptilians tend to be pretty pro-faggot, but "ISIS shooter in your backyard" has all the hallmarks of a CIA false-flag.
Are some of you still dumb enough to pay attention to/take seriously evilhomer?
His only reason for existence is to troll and very rarely engage in random only banter
See? SolRo is another good example. Irrational, quarrelous people absolutely hate it when you are open-minded and respectful; such behavior is so far outside of their accustomed mode of thinking, that they assume you must be intentionally trying to piss them off.
It's funny, but also sad, and more than a little worrying - as such people seem, not just incapable of carrying on mature, rational debates with their fellow netizens, but even incapable of admitting that there *can exist* points-of-view other than their own! This idea held by Messrs Gmork and SolRo - that there are only two kinds of people: those who believe exactly as they do, and Trolls, who act solely to inflict emotional pain on the true believers - is very depressing, and sadly, becoming all too common.
"This idea held by Messrs Gmork and SolRo - that there are only two kinds of people: those who believe exactly as they do, and Trolls"
There EH goes again, putting words in my mouth that I would never, in a million years, support. It's like your main thing.
You pretty much confirmed what I've been saying, EH - you create the narrative that suits you, and reality be damned. I'm starting to think you don't even read anything I say, you just look for keywords and hammer out a response regardless.
I would love to have a rational, reasoned debate with an open-minded person, EH, as I've had with plenty members on this site - you simply don't fit the criteria.
Framing your condescension, assumptions and flat out lies in a "polite" manner does not constitute being rational or open-minded.
Gmork, my friend, I have never said that being polite "constitutes" being open-minded or rational. I am polite, open-minded, and rational; three seperate, distinct things which are interrelated, yet independent, of each other. The latter are not constituted by the former.
You complain about non-specific "lies" and allegedly "putting things in your mouth", only to turn around and do this...?
I may have alluded to this before, and if I was not clear at that prior time, then I apologize. Being open-minded requires you to give a certain level of respect to people who do not share your views; therefore, politeness engenders open-mindedness. And being rational requires a willingness to grant serious consideration to arguments and ideas which run counter to your own; therefore, open-mindedness engenders rationality. This is why I say the three are interrelated; however, one does not, nor have I ever meant to claim it to, "constitute" the others.
well, the one military guy i know isn't going to vote for Trump, so he's not going to win. the same guy isn't voting for Hillary, so she's not going to win. therefor, all the military is voting for Bernie. your graphic is rigged. Miely's eyes are not.
the reply button is also rigged. poetv is owned by the Clintons.
Reply buttons clearly undemocratic
all my bros in the military are voting for trump with enthusiasm
all your bros in the military are dumbasses
All his bros in the military are keeping you safe and free.
all his bros in the military are imaginary.
How exactly are they keeping me free when they're on a different continent and there's no standing enemy army actively threatening my freedom?
You do realize that there are hundreds of military bases right here in the United States, and there's a little something called ISIS which just launched an attack on an American gay club?
... or maybe freedom for gays isn't big on your list of priorities, I don't know. Just remember: once the Caliphate is done with the LGBT community, it will come for the fat people next.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|