|Old_Zircon - 2016-09-02 |
So they were marketing to professional drag queens?
|EvilHomer - 2016-09-02 |
So your personal telescreens are now not only spying on what you say and what you watch and where you are, but now they're also collecting sophisticated biometric data in real-time.
Yes, the advertisement is truly what consumers need to be thinking about. Thank you, CNN.
"Biometric telescreens; sexist or not?" - discuss it amongst yourselves.
The secret to getting the proles to accept 24/7 surveillance is to frame it as a form of celebrity. Every prole has an audience, every prole is a star. "Imagine" said O'Wildcat to WinstonHomer "a Warhol designed shoe stomping you in the face ..forever."
Warhol's too expensive to license. Minilove will just outsource the shoe design to whatever Chinese sweatshop came up with the iWatch.
Eventually, most of them (most!) reached a consensus that they *weren't* going to mutate into flesh-eating zombies if they wore a FitBit. So everything was fine, crisis averted, biometric data-harvesters for everyone.
Since then I have learned to keep my mouth shut. Shoes, not required.
|memedumpster - 2016-09-02 |
The sum totality of this schtick went out in 1993, which is also the last time Samsung made a decent product.
|Maggot Brain - 2016-09-02 |
Oh, Dee Dee! You fat lush.
|SolRo - 2016-09-02 |
Or is it just really direct marketing at the 'housewives of...' audience?
|15th - 2016-09-04 |
:24-27 What the hell was that?
| Register or login To Post a Comment|