I get more of a Sarah Silverman/Zach Galafanakis comedy/horror vibe.

Classic Meg Ryan - Billy Crystal RomCom material.

Glen Close, F Murray Abraham

Thunderfoot and Anita Sarkeesian.

Eric Andre in whiteface and a sewer rat in a wig.

When you post the Orc tribute.

here, cuz you seem unduly hated at times and I haven't figured out why

I am indeed hated, by all the right people.

And you're apathy-ed for being tiresome lately by all the right people, too.

>>>And you're apathy-ed for being tiresome lately by all the right people, too.

Wait, what?

>>And you're apathy-ed for being tiresome lately by all the right people, too.

Wow, that's really hurtful. Could you repeat that one more time, just so I'm sure I understood?

>>And you're apathy-ed for being tiresome lately by all the right people, too.

Well that's just ... WHAT?

QED

>>>Q.E.D. is an initialism of the Latin phrase quod erat demonstrandum, meaning "which is what had to be shown". The phrase is traditionally placed in its abbreviated form at the end of a mathematical proof or philosophical argument when the original proposition has been exactly restated as the conclusion of the demonstration. The abbreviation thus signals the completion of the proof.

I bet you use that one all the time, don't you?

>>I bet you use that one all the time, don't you?

If Mr Guy frequently proves his arguments, then yes, he will use the phrase all the time. QED.

Are you saying that he proved mathematically that I am "apathy-ed"? Do you really want to hitch your wagon to this rhetorical star?

you are apathycious

>>Are you saying that he proved mathematically that I am "apathy-ed"?

"at the end of a mathematical proof or philosophical argument"

As per the very definition which you copied, pasted, and (presumably) read! Mr Guy does not need to "mathematically prove" anything in order to invoke the term "QED". He can also make a philosophical argument - or rather, as is the case here, you yourself can provide ample, axiomatic proof for his argument, at which point he may declare his argument as having been shown.

And at any rate, if you paid attention to what I was saying, you'd see that my comment above neither confirmed nor denied the truth of Mr Guy's claims regarding your apathy. Rather, my comment was in response to your general claim about Mr Guy's behavior and arguments. In other words, I said nothing about you being apathy-ed, I simply replied to your question, "I bet you use that one all the time, don't you?" Thus, your last response is moot.

You know by now that I hitch my wagon to whatever "rhetorical star" is factually or logically correct.

That's because they forgot to make a joke.

Here's the original, if you're not familiar. Maybe that will help.

https://youtu.be/WK4HHaNhcgU

I think it's hilarious, but your smilage may vary.

Everyone on the planet is familiar with that song. Old people and babies all know that song. It won a grammy and was on Glee and in video games and probably in some movie. I just don't see any sort of joke going on here. Sarkeesian sounds like Streisand, kind of? Is that the joke?

Never heard of it.

If it's funny, it's because Dr. f00t's apparent obsession with Anita is funny. His way of always getting around to talking about her is funny. His English comtempt is funny. Above all, the way he says "Anita Sarkeesian" over and over is hilarious. There's no joke. I just took what was already ineffably funny to me, and isolated it in an absurd context. To me, it's pretty amusing.

He used to be a well respected science vlogger who also countered creationist claims a-la potholer54, then he discovered women are allowed to have opinions and jobs and actual free will these days and don't have to get male permission to exist and ever since then he has spent his entire life being angry about it to the point where his one decent scientific reputation is now in the toilet.

That's the basic summary.

So Thunderfoot is your alt, then?

I thought his videos were about global warming, or dinosaurs, or something?

You should have submitted that video instead! H. Bomber is hilarious. I just submitted his hour-and-a-half Fallout 3 review, which is proving more divisive than I would have predicted.

ABSOLUTELY, H Bomber Guy is amazing, at more than one level. The best part is that laugh of his. He just cracks up at something and I don't know if its genuine, but I m laughing just as loud. And he's so penetrating, and so great at inventing visual jokes. I'd been toying with the udea of becoming a you tube pundit, but h bomb does it better than I ever could.

I accept your apology. Now go submit H. Bomber videos instead.

You're welcome.

>>>The only people who pay attention to Thunderf00t are people who can't shut up about how people should stop paying attention to Thunderf00t.

(FACEPALM)

Why would anyone want people to stop paying attention to Thunderf00t? His followers clearly aren't paying ENOUGH attention, and anybody else who isn't paying attention is missing a great show!

Hey John, thanks to your submissions, I've been getting some really bizarre recommended videos. Did you know New Boxxy and Laura Southern collaborate together? Have you ever seen their videos? What do you think of that pairing?

(by New Boxxy, I mean that one girl you like, the girl who looks like Boxxy but is not Boxxy. Sexier than Catie, not quite as geeky, her name isn't Shoenice but it's shoe-something?)

You're talking about Shoe On Head, who I knew as June in her pre-gamergate days. She's actually been around for a while, so it may be more accurate to call her "Evil Boxxy".

I used to like June, and she did a video recently that I found worth discussing. She's working with Lauren Southern? (Cringe) Yeah, that makes sense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFsFZwpB-tE

There's a special place in hell for people who don't support these two women.

Well, at least it's a SPECIAL place.

What about her mom? How's the Elder Mrs June?

Don't force me to apathy you.

It's the other way around, John. You are not the one doing the apathy, you are the one being apathy-ed.

It's important to you that I care, isn't it, Homer?