|Scrimmjob - 2016-10-12 |
Forget CWC, my stars go to the gentleman at 2:20!
1 is really the only good answer under the circumstances.
|dairyqueenlatifah - 2016-10-13 |
|Jeriko-1 - 2016-10-13 |
Spoilers: Chris Chan isn't the villain here. /pol/ is so fucking gross that it makes Chris Chan just an innocent bystander.
|Crab Mentality - 2016-10-13 |
The host is a real piece of shit.
Hey, let's pair this guy up with the guy from Fox News that interviewed people in Chinatown!
|Nikon - 2016-10-13 |
Sorry Chris, that's incorrect. There are only three genders.
Male, female, and attack helicopter.
But what about American-made versus Russian-made attack helicopters? Seeing as that's going to be the next big Super-Important Culture War to keep us proles occupied (thanks, Hillary), the distinction between these two additional genders is not unimportant.
|misterbuns - 2016-10-13 |
At this point your obsession with this person is weirder than the person you think you're mocking.
I doubt there will ever be anything weirder than Chris-chan.
CWC is the millennial John Waters; of course he's going to have a fanbase. Stop hatin'.
Unless you're just complaining about the weens, A-Ligs, and slanderers. In which case, yes, they are worse.
|Scrotum H. Vainglorious - 2016-10-13 |
3:49 would wife.
|pastorofmuppets - 2016-10-14 |
Came for CWC, stayed for the Ron Paul-worshipping Virginian hating on drag queens.
This video should come with tasting notes. After letting it swirl around for a while, I think my new favorite thing are all the well-meaning folks who didn't say 2 but also just pulled a discrete number out of a hat.
It's like... 5, right? You got yer two normal ones, yer flat-chested-with-short-haircuts, that kid on the Goldbergs, and, um, Turners?
| Register or login To Post a Comment|