| 73Q Music Videos | Vote On Clips | Submit | Login   |

Help keep poeTV running


And please consider not blocking ads here. They help pay for the server. Pennies at a time. Literally.



Comment count is 18
simon666 - 2016-12-06

Stupid indexicals!


simon666 - 2016-12-06

And these


Xenocide - 2016-12-06

Fuck you, Smokey. You're a giant bear with an axe and you're apparently a park ranger. You could prevent fires if you wanted to. But no, instead you outsource your life-threatening work to children.


SolRo - 2016-12-06

I supposed a mutant, axe-wielding bear-man could murder all potential arsonists, and teenagers at make out point, but the lightning caused fires would still happen.


Binro the Heretic - 2016-12-06

You don't want Smokey preventing forest fires.

Smokey prevents forest fires by eating people.


EvilHomer - 2016-12-07

Smokey doesn't have to kill people. Smokey could use his axe to chop down all the trees. Then the forest would no longer pose a fire hazard (even from lightning), and the timber could be sold, with any profits helping to fund further fire prevention programs.


Gmork - 2016-12-06

Awaiting maladjusted douchebag's response.


Sanest Man Alive - 2016-12-06

But you already commented.


Gmork - 2016-12-06

How can it be a response when it's the original post? You're stupid.


EvilHomer - 2016-12-07

Your comment is a response to this video. It may be the OP of this particular comment-thread, but it's also a response to something.

You aren't stupid, Gmork, you just don't think things through.


Gmork - 2016-12-07

This video was posted before I made my comment, therefore the response I was awaiting would had to have come AFTER I posted my comment.

You aren't stupid EvilHomer, you just don't think things through.


EvilHomer - 2016-12-08

Of course the video was posted BEFORE you made the comment! That's what a RESPONSE is, dumb-dumb!

Waugh posts a video, you respond to it. You didn't specify to which response you were referring, and that ambiguity was noticed by Sanest Man - so now, here we are. If you don't like this current state-of-affairs, then perhaps in the future you should be less vague, and word your insults more carefully?


EvilHomer - 2016-12-08

Here are a few ways you could have written that OP, so as to remove the ambiguity and better convey your intended meaning:

"Awaiting maladjusted douchebag's response to this, my current comment."
"Awaiting the response of a maladjusted douchebag who is not myself."
"Waugh is, in my opinion, a maldajusted douchebag, and I am awaiting his response."
"I do not like Waugh."

Any of those would have worked better than what you actually said.


Gmork - 2016-12-08

I can't have AWAITED MY OWN RESPONSE, you fucking idiot. It doesn't work no matter how you try and weasel out of admitting it.


Gmork - 2016-12-08

"You didn't specify to which response you were referring,"

The word "awaiting" indicates the response would have had to come AFTER my post, how can you be this fucking stupid?

Honestly, homer, you're not even trying anymore.


Gmork - 2016-12-08

"and that ambiguity was noticed by Sanest Man"

There was zero ambiguity. "Awaiting" means it hadn't happened yet at the time of my posting. There is no wiggle room for you to argue otherwise.

God, your schtick is getting old. You know you're wrong, but you love making a big show of pretending you've got a valid point.


Maggot Brain - 2016-12-07

This bit goes on for nine minutes in the German version.


Waugh - 2016-12-08

!!!!!


Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement