| 73Q Music Videos | Vote On Clips | Submit | Login   |

Reddit Digg Stumble Facebook
Desc:what an actual Republican health plan looks like
Category:Nature & Places, Fashion
Tags:ACA, Liberal Redneck, Trae Crowder, Trumpcare, AHCA
Submitted:Bort
Date:03/15/17
Views:632
Rating:
View Ratings
Register to vote for this video
Favorited 1 Time

People Who Liked This Video Also Liked:
Jiz
Tajazzle Infomercial
High speed Amtrak train hits snow bank
Adam Carolla and Norm MacDonald Analyze Kenny Rogers Songs
Cute Baby Trying to Eat Tomato
Ed McCurdy - The Cuckolded Husband
Do Not Disobey Marc Summers
Zero Punctuation: Prince of Persia - The Forgotten Sands
Maybellene
Train Simulator 2012
Comment count is 5
Bort
Smart people talking about the lessons of Obamacare:

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/15/14908524/obam acare-lessons-ahca-gop

The seventh and final lesson is the one that people don't appreciate nearly enough: "Prices are the fundamental challenge in American health care - and reform will remain an exasperating exercise until that changes."

I've been saying that ever since Green Mountain Single Payer collapsed and I realized what went wrong. That was, uh, late 2014.
Nominal
Hilldawg shrillary right of center corporate globalist war with syria! Hail Bernie!

Bort
Yeah, I've been called a corporatist shill plenty of times, because I can do arithmetic and want a health care system that won't immediately blow up.

One of the smarter things about the ACA is that it is ready to pass savings on to the customer if and when we can start capping medical costs. Insurers have to devote 80%-85% of premium dollars to paying claims, so if the prices of those claims go down, premiums have to go down as well. So here's the conundrum for single payer advocates: if medical costs go down to a point where single payer is viable, will it even be worth the effort to convert at that point?

I know there are plenty of single payer advocates who ultimately don't give a damn about whether single payer helps people go to the doctor when they need to; their motive is ultimately to stick it to private insurers. Those people are in a bind, because there is no clear path to single payer that doesn't also help keep private insurance viable, so they can't really get what they want either way.

Nominal
Hey look Bernie is back at it again with his Brand New Congress style rhetoric. Surely this can't spell disaster in 2020.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/03/15/bern ie-sanders-still-doesnt-know-what-the-democratic-party-stands-for/ ?utm_term=.7517547ce12c&wpisrc=nl_az_most&wpmk=1

If this election cycle has taught anything, it's that anyone using the word "establishment" has a 99% chance of not knowing what the hell they're talking about.

Bort
Huh, speaking of people who want single payer for no other reason than sticking it to private insurers, and don't really care whether they've established a viable system.

You know why it's hard for Bernie to see what the Democrats stand for? Because he wants them to stand for something so small it can fit on a bumper sticker, like "eat the rich". The Democrats stand for a number of things that aren't simplistic enough to reduce to bumper stickers, like effective government that tries to balance the many and often competing interests of people and organizations of this country to provide the best outcomes for as many as possible. That sometimes means eating the rich, or at least reining them in; but sometimes businesses do useful things too (such as providing jobs or doing research that separates us from the Amish) so maybe the best solution isn't always to smash businesses like an angry lumbering retard.

Don't forget "neoliberal" as a nearly infallible indicator of not knowing a goddamn thing.

Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement