| 73Q Music Videos | Vote On Clips | Submit | Login   |

Reddit Digg Stumble Facebook
Desc:
Category:News & Politics, Accidents & Explosions
Tags:clinton, Megyn Kelly, Putin, trump
Submitted:Nikon
Date:06/05/17
Views:1002
Rating:
View Ratings
Register to vote for this video

People Who Liked This Video Also Liked:
Michael Keaton is Jack Frost
McDonalds Reinvents the Straw
When I Light Your Darkened Door
Man With Cerebal Palsy Reviews Battle Raper 2
Space Is So Startling performed by students in Mackinac, USA, 1964
Microsoft scammer tells Lenny to shut up!
The Destiny™ Experience
Operation Dominic - Harlem 108511
リョナ Kintaro decimates Kitana
World Beard & Moustache Championships 2007 - The Parade
Comment count is 6
Maggot Brain - 2017-06-05
If you don't know the tailor who made your suit you're obviously naked!
Doomstein - 2017-06-05
My suit was made in Vietnam, I'm willing to bet the farm their last name is Nguyen.

misterbuns - 2017-06-06
How is lying to kelly "smashing" her?

Wouldnt "smashing" her be having her murdered?

Anyway cool video!
Nikon - 2017-06-08
Comey showed today that there was no Russian interference in the election. Putin was telling the truth, and the lies Kelly had been trying to sell are toast.

Tyrannosaurus Rekt.

Oscar Wildcat - 2017-06-08
I see. So, you see the following exchanges as validating your position?

BURR: Do you have any doubt that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 elections?

COMEY: None.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the intrusions in the DNC and the DCCC systems, and the subsequent leaks of that information?

COMEY: No, no doubt.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that the Russian government was behind the cyber intrusion in the state voter files?

COMEY: No.

BURR: Do you have any doubt that officials of the Russian government were fully aware of these activities?

COMEY: No doubt.

Or this exchange:

HEINRICH: The — the president has repeatedly talked about the Russian investigation into the U.S. — or the Russian — Russia’s involvement in the U.S. election cycle as a hoax and as fake news.

Can you talk a little bit about what you saw as FBI director — and, obviously, only the parts that you can share in this setting — that — that demonstrate how serious this action actually was, and why there was an investigation in the first place?

COMEY: Yes, sir.

The — there should be no fuzz on this whatsoever. The Russians interfered in our election during the 2016 cycle. They did it with purpose. They did it with sophistication. They did it with overwhelming technical efforts. And it was an active-measures campaign driven from the top of that government. There is no fuzz on that.

It is a high-confidence judgment of the entire intelligence community, and — and the members of this committee have — have seen the intelligence. It’s not a close call. That happened. That’s about as un-fake as you can possibly get, and is very, very serious, which is why it’s so refreshing to see a bipartisan focus on that, because this is about America, not about any particular party.

HEINRICH: So that was a hostile act by the Russian government against this country?

COMEY: Yes, sir.

HEINRICH: Did the president, in any of those interactions that you’ve shared with us today, ask you what you should be doing, or what our government should be doing, or the intelligence community, to protect America against Russian interference in our election system?COMEY: I don’t recall a conversation like that.

HEINRICH: Never?

COMEY: No.



I mean, really, Nikon. What does the man have to do, come to your home, remove your hands from your ears, and shout directly into them?

Nikon - 2017-07-02
The New York Times has finally admitted that one of the favorite Russia-gate canards – that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies concurred on the assessment of Russian hacking of Democratic emails – is false.

On Thursday, the Times appended a correction to a June 25 article that had repeated the false claim, which has been used by Democrats and the mainstream media for months to brush aside any doubts about the foundation of the Russia-gate scandal and portray President Trump as delusional for doubting what all 17 intelligence agencies supposedly knew to be true.

In the Times’ White House Memo of June 25, correspondent Maggie Haberman mocked Trump for “still refus[ing] to acknowledge a basic fact agreed upon by 17 American intelligence agencies that he now oversees: Russia orchestrated the attacks, and did it to help get him elected.”

However, on Thursday, the Times – while leaving most of Haberman’s ridicule of Trump in place – noted in a correction that the relevant intelligence “assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.”

The Times’ grudging correction was vindication for some Russia-gate skeptics who had questioned the claim of a full-scale intelligence assessment, which would usually take the form of a National Intelligence Estimate (or NIE), a product that seeks out the views of the entire Intelligence Community and includes dissents.

Vote tallies and results do not appear to have been altered.

Most likely it was Seth Rich who looked into DNC affairs and was murdered for it.
Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement