Old_Zircon - 2017-06-18
When Ebert was wrong he sure committed to it.
|
Old_Zircon - 2017-06-18 Although he liked Reanimator a lot more than Blue Velvet, so he got that right at least.
|
BHWW - 2017-06-18
Ebert basically went nuts over "Blue Velvet" and became a reliable "thumbs down" for Lynch - so much so that Lynch ran an ad for Lost Highway that said "Two Thumbs Down--Two More Reasons to See Lost Highway".
Then Mullholland Drive makes it's way into theaters and suddenly Ebert decides there's some merit to Lynch's work after all. What made the difference: Mulholland Drive's lesbian sex scene, which was one of Ebert's "critical" preoccupations. Of the many stupefying, dumb statements in his review was the line "The way you know the movie is over is that it ends."
|
|
|
Old_Zircon - 2017-06-19 Mulholland Drive is kind of a mess, it really, REALLY shows its roots as a rejected pilot that was hastily reworked for theaters.
In my opinion anyway. It was the last David Lynch movie I bothered to see (unless The straight Story came out later, I honestly wish Lynch would do more conventional narratives like Straight Story and Blue Velvet and The Elephant Man, he's much better at them).
|
Old_Zircon - 2017-06-19 I also saw Mullholland Falls for the same reason Bort did and it delivered.
|
Register or login To Post a Comment |