Old_Zircon - 2018-07-26
I can never decide if The Frighteners was the last good Peter Jackson movie or the first bad one, because it's kind of both.
|
|
SolRo - 2018-07-26 OZ is 2hip2care
|
|
|
Old_Zircon - 2018-07-27 I thought the first one was fun in the theater and they did a really good job on the Shire parts at the beginning, they capture the feel of the book and Tolkin's original art really well; once they leave the shire it feels more and more like a generic Hollywood blockbuster to me, but it's still solid. It's no Dead-Alive or Heavenly Creatures or anything, but it's probably as good as The Frighteners. I tried to watch it on DVD once and tapped out an hour in out of boredom. I think I finished the second one but it was kind of boring even in the theater. I never saw the third one.
I'm glad Peter JAckson's still out there doing his thing though, even if a lot of it is kind of embarrassing lately. I'd put him more in the category of Sam Raimi than Tim Burton, as far as directors who did a few really interesting, unique movies in the late 80s and early 90s and then kind of outgrew their own directorial voices.
I wouldn't call any of the later Peter Jackson movies I've seen BAD but they're a little on the bland side (and to be fair I haven't seen The Lovely Bones, the most recent one I've sat down and watched was the first 45 minutes or so of the first Hobbit movie, which was.. technically competent.
|
Nominal - 2018-07-27 You could always administer the Peter Jackson hipster test:
Was Bad Taste Jackson's best movie?
|
|
BillLumbergh - 2018-07-27
these slips were apparently symptoms of his parkinson's-- he had been diagnosed just a few years before. I'm glad he could have a laugh about it.
|
|
|
casualcollapse - 2018-07-28
Why does he do interviews as himself?
|
Register or login To Post a Comment |