|Slumgullion - 2019-06-07 |
He's a CHIIIiiild molester! *throws Freud out the window*
|gravelstudios - 2019-06-08 |
There is the theory that the whole movie is just Tom Green playing a huge prank on the movie industry. That he made the worst film he could make on purpose to highlight the absurdity that anybody would trust him to make a film in the first place. If that's true, it's pretty meta.
Miss Henson's 6th grade class
Nah. It's too far outside of Green's wheelhouse, which is gonzo performance art. Green probably knew that he was no actor, but I don't buy the idea that its badness was intentional.
I also have to say that I love the zebra who looks like his dad in the movie.
Considering the plot of the film is that Tom Greens character is selling a shitty concept that he then squanders the money on I’m going with the meta.
Also, the name of the movie is literally referencing the sexual abuse of a child, so yeah, meta.
You mean a movie where the plot is defrauding a movie studio with a terrible idea is actually about defrauding a movie studio with a terrible idea?
I'm going to go with yeah definitely working the meta.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|