| 73Q Music Videos | Vote On Clips | Submit | Login   |

Help keep poeTV running


And please consider not blocking ads here. They help pay for the server. Pennies at a time. Literally.



Comment count is 60
Mike Tyson?! - 2008-05-30

Man, she cracked up so easily.


Cleaner82 - 2008-05-30

There comes a point in every violation of human rights by law enforcement where the cop has to decide, "Am I going to go all the way with this and cave the fucker's head in with a truncheon?" Generally they choose yes, and get a week's suspension with pay.


Smellvin - 2008-05-30

I look forward to the ensuing debate over whether this guy is a douchebag or a hero because he refused to just do what the border agent wanted him to do.


Repomancer - 2008-05-30

Hero. Debate's over.

Those people are supposed to be working for *you*. Sometimes they need to be reminded of it.


Iakchos - 2008-05-30

My vote goes for a douchebag, but somewhat heroic one.


zatojones - 2008-05-30

Yeah. Plainly a hero. He knows his rights and he doesn't let anyone use a badge intimidate him into giving them up. In America that's the very definition of hero.


Lurchi - 2008-05-30

both


Syd Midnight - 2008-05-30

I dunno.. a rule of mine is that the difference between insanity and creativity is that the creative can act normal when the cops show up.

I'd like to think he's a hero, but he was just BEGGING for it. He was being an asshole. An asshole making a point is still an asshole. Would it have KILLED him to show her his ID? Was he detained? What did he prove besides "border patrol agents will respect your privacy and not taser you for being an incredibly obnoxious ass, which pretty much makes them useless"?

There's a lot of ways to show that this is a worthless show of pseudo-fascist govt. force, but I was cheering for him to get tasered, so this is not a good one.


mr666 - 2008-05-30

He's a douchebag. But at least he using he douchebagness in a good way.


Cleaner82 - 2008-05-30

In theory, Syd, what he proved was that the border patrol didn't have the right to detain him, making the whole 'checkpoint' superfluous. You want these people stopping and searching you because they feel like it, with no legal precedent to do so? Without telling Joe Average he has the right to just truck on through? I have to imagine that given the proper set of circumstances, the freakin' border patrol can utilize force, or call upon people who can -- making this then, NOT the proper set of circumstances. Y'dig?


ChocFullOfFunk - 2008-05-30

I mean, it wouldn't have killed him to show her his ID, sure, but, like, you shouldn't need to show an ID to exist anywhere. Sure you need to show one to drive, but this was a different matter entirely.


mr666 - 2008-05-30

Actually, Cleaner, the border patrol can stop and search you when you pass through a border checkpoint without probable cause, just. Unlike the drug/alcohol checkpoints you'll see the highway cops set up, the Supreme court has ruled that the border patrol has more freedom in those circumstances.


Adramelech - 2008-05-30

People that understand their rights are clearly douchebags. lawl


Dinky Patterson - 2008-05-30

A useful douchebag.

At 1:03 she tells him that he's not being detained, but he keeps asking away.

Also, I could barely hear her when he was talking to her through the window at the beginning, so I doubt she could clearly make out what he was saying before he rolled it down.


Cleaner82 - 2008-05-30

Well my reasoning goes like this 666, and admittedly I have NONE of the facts here, so poke holes as you see fit. I'm going only as far as my feeble grasp of logic will take me. Border goon stops motorist. Border goon asks motorist for various things and to do various things. Motorist obeys none of these requests, repeatedly asks if he's being detained, finally recieving a 'no'. Now it seems to me that if the border goon had the right to demand his cooperation, she would have, and it seems to me that if all those people that had been stopped were aware that they were within their rights not to cooperate, they may not have.

That's the reason we have Miranda rights, so that people are aware exactly what they do and do not have to do in the eyes of the law. Am I wrong?


Thatcher Pennywhistle - 2008-05-30

He's voting Ron Paul.


mr666 - 2008-05-30

Well, Cleaner, I was just referringto your comment on border patrol and searches. Regarding this video, there is no search occuring so that is kind of a non-issue.


Syd Midnight - 2008-05-31

He wasn't just ambling through a border checkpoint, he was asking.. BEGGING to be martyred. He wanted to be a Hero so bad, he came off like an agitprop jackass. Nice "camera noises" to make it all seem so casual.

He could have talked about the laws and project and who voted for it, but instead begged to get tasered. Reminds me of the kinda dick who gets into fights with a gas station attendant over the price of gas.

It's not that chick's FAULT. Being a massive prick to cops is not a constructive way to protest unjust govt. programs, it just makes you feel like Mr Turner Diary hero. And in the end, he begged to be abused as hard as he could, but they let him go. Whatever cause he's championing, he came off like an utter fuckolio.


Xenocide - 2008-05-31

Heroic douchebag. Knew what he was there to do and stuck to his guns.


Cleaner82 - 2008-05-31

Never said it was the border goon's *fault*, being simply a tiny cog in a massive machine, as are we all to some degree. But you can't be afraid to assert your rights just because, oh gee whiz she looks like a swell lady, yeah search away. Wouldn't want to hurt her feelings after all.

He wasn't begging to be tasered, he was asserting his rights in a highly annoying and douchebaggy way. People are so worried about not offending the guy that's searching their butthole for contraband that they forget they're being violated. Or they just hope that if they're really nice, he won't hit colon.


Enjoy - 2008-05-31

Hero and anyone who says different can leave right now for a communist country.


Camonk - 2008-05-31

Enjoy's America: Agree with me or you are a communist! Yeah man! Fuck yeah! Since I'm already in a communist country, I can say this guy's a douche.


garcet71283 - 2008-06-01

Douchebag.


After putting her through that he didn't thank her for being a good sport and not caving his head in with something.


Charles - 2009-04-10

He's a complete douche, and not useful for anything other than pissing people off. Border agents can be jackasses too, I know that for a fact, but what exactly is systematically wrong with what they do?


Frank Rizzo - 2008-05-30

this is like some fucked up comedy sketch


Cleaner82 - 2008-05-30

Poor border patrol chick didn't sign up for all this 'ethical' hoo-ha.


SpookyElectric - 2008-05-30

I go with douchebag, personally. Amazingly, this isn't on boingboing. Yet.

Did you notice the webcam on his dash? Nice touch.


Twitch - 2008-05-30

I always puss out around cops.

This is proof I need to grow some balls, or stop smuggling heroin across the Canadian border. Or at least cut back. Do they make a patch for that?


Syd Midnight - 2008-05-30

I'd give it +3 stars if she had a thick rural Canadian accent, and went all Trailer Park Boys on his smart-ass.


Syd Midnight - 2008-05-30

On second thought, fuck +3, that'd be 5 straight stars right there.


Gill_Sans - 2008-05-30

FREEZE FRAME!


manfred - 2008-05-30

DR RON PAUL


Hooker - 2008-06-01

And that's why I'm going with douchebag.

That girl was doing her job (whatever it is). I've been flagged down by the police while I was walking on the sidewalk because I fit the profile of someone they were looking for (more than likely, because I had a bandana on and hadn't shaved in a few days). I wasn't being detained, but I also wasn't stupid enough to assume there was a vast, malevolent conspiracy to grind down my civil freedoms on a millstone (and even if there was, the grunts themselves wouldn't be partaking). I co-operated, I was shortly on my way, and a couple police cops got to not absolutely loathe their jobs for a bit.


Hooker - 2008-06-01

Also, the only way to stand up against civil rights violations is to take it to the grunts.


NineEleven - 2008-05-31

He probably complains about all the illegals running around too. D'oh!


futurebot - 2008-05-31

Hero. Anyone who disagrees with me, I demand to know your real name and address. Yes, I may have a name and a badge number, no, you do not have the right to see them.


Syd Midnight - 2008-05-31

Can we have sex?


sannyasin - 2008-05-31

Border check point in southern US LG:

I was driving with three other colleagues, one French Canadian, when I got stopped at one of these in the southwestern USA. After rolling down the window the guard asked us if we were American to which the three of us who were responded "YES!" in unison before our French Canadian colleague could respond. Being white guys and the majority saying yes, he said we could go on without any further hassle.

After we cleared the check point our French Canadian colleague said we should have said we had a foreigner with us. I told him that although he had his passport and he was legally here we would have been searched and delayed like the people who were getting searched at the check point with Mexican plates. He was still distressed about not declaring his nationality so one of my colleagues asked him how he felt to be a real American finally to ease his anxiety. He responded, "Embarrassed."

Getting back to the guy in the video, I think he is a douche. I have to deal with agents of Homeland Security quite frequently. Although it is annoying, I find the best approach is to smile and be friendly and you'll get through the check point with minimal hassle.

The people who work for Homeland Security are rather lowly on the totem pole (both life and as federal employees) and I would rank them at the level of mall security. As such if you treat them like human beings and play along with their charade you'll get past them with minimal annoyance (which is my goal as proving a point, albeit valid, doesn't accomplish anything towards both of us meeting our goals).


Mike Tyson?! - 2008-05-31

So how many times can they stop you before you are allowed to complain?


sannyasin - 2008-05-31

They stop me every time I go through a check point (hence why it is a check point). I find if I treat them like a human being and be nice I can get through with minimal delay. However if I had the douche bag in the clip in front of me I would be delayed as I waited for them to sort him out before I could play nice guy and get through in seconds.

The people who join the ranks of Homeland Security aren't exactly your first string sort of people. However they feel they have a job to do protecting America and all that. My job is to minimize my time spent with them. I find I can accomplish both our goals most efficiently by being nice to them and joking (when appropriate). I get through quickly and they feel they've done their job protecting us from terrorists, drug smugglers and illegal aliens.

To whoever calls this guy a hero, think about all the other people behind him who he is delaying with his libertarian antics.


halon - 2008-05-31

Oh man, somebody was inconvenienced by a guy exercising his rights? That must have been terrible.


Westward - 2008-05-31

Man, I would be pissed if I didn't make it to McDonald's before they quit serving breakfast just because some asshole wouldn't let the lowest person on the totem pole rummage through his stuff baselessly.

God what kind of world do we live in


sosage - 2008-05-31

Wait a second...when did checkpoints with ID checks in this country become a normal everyday thing to see? The only checkpoints I have ever run into involve the CHP asking "have you been drinking? No. Goodbye."

Also. A double douche that knows his rights, trying to convince the world he is a hero.


raeshaldis - 2008-05-31

I don't understand what this proves. It just made me feel bad for her. She didn't make the rules. She is just trying to do her job.


DrVital - 2008-05-31

It proves that you still have rights under the US Constitution.

Have a nice day!


zatojones - 2008-05-31

Yeah but did you see how uncomfortable and confused she looked? I don't think the founding fathers meant for our rights to make a government employee feel that way.


SolRo - 2008-05-31

That's her fault, government employees aren't supposed to have any emotions. It's in their job discriptions.


Enjoy - 2008-05-31

Yeah why wasn't this man being nice to his government overlords who were trying to illegaly question him?


roscar - 2008-05-31

Douchebag. He was being needlessly antagonistic in order to cause a scene. He could've handled that much better without giving up any information.


1394 - 2008-05-31

Hey! That's the checkpoint by Ajo! All they do is shine a flashlight to see if there are drugs or two dozen illegals crammed in the back, which she ended up checking for in the end after all.


Monchiles Monchiles - 2008-05-31

Exactly. Fucking exactly.


Lurchi - 2008-05-31

Would have been even better if he had used a fake Speedy Gonzales type accent.


joyofdiscord - 2008-05-31

So this dude is the douchebag? Not the administrators of this border checkpoint who failed to inform their poor pretty blonde lackies of the rights of the citizens they are ostensibly protecting?

Could he have gotten through quicker by surrendering his rights? Sure. That doesn't mean it's a good idea for the populace to get in the habit of surrendering any and all rights (which 90% of the populace has no idea they have anyway) that will make things quicker when faced with an ignorant government agent. But hey, he was a U.S. citizen, right? If he had nothing to hide, why should he care?

And honestly Syd, he could have gotten into a discussion about who voted for the law and blah blah blah? Are you fucking kidding me? That's appropriate behaviour for a dinner party conversation, not a checkpoint. Trying to get into a goddamn political discussion with a LEO, now THAT is douchebaggy behaviour. Here's where I will pull out the "just doing their job" card. Their job is not to discuss the merits of a piece of legislation and its sponsors. Their job is to enforce that legislation while honoring the constitutional rights of the citizenry. If they fail to complete the latter provision, they are no longer "just doing their jobs." They are now acting in VIOLATION of the law.

So please, advise me POETV, how can we enjoy the protections of our Constitutional rights without being big meanies? Perhaps if more people were apprised of their rights and exercised them, law enforcement would become aware that we have rights and be prepared to honor them without a long stuttering bout of confusion. Then suddenly having rights wouldn't make you a big meanie.


Magical Man from Happy-Land - 2008-05-31

"[W]hile the need to make routine checkpoint stops is great, the consequent intrusion on Fourth Amendment interests is quite limited." - United States v. Martinez-Fuerte. 428 U.S. at 557.

Did anyone bother to, you know, look up the actual law on this kind of thing?

Oh hey guess what, these checkpoints are completely constitutional and yes, you can be temporarily detained at border checkpoints without individualized, reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing.

I'm all for people asserting their constitutional rights, but they should know exactly what rights they have before they go all apeshit on some poor border patrol agent.

Pick your battles, dude.


DrVital - 2008-05-31

He did know his rights.

Are you upset that he exercised them?


Magical Man from Happy-Land - 2008-05-31

Which right was he asserting? Which right was the officer violating?


zatojones - 2008-05-31

Depends. Where they intending to search his car?


Discordia - 2008-05-31

http://www.poetv.com/video.php?vid=22042


Big Beef Burritos Supreme - 2008-05-31

I just don't get the point of his actions.


M-DEEM - 2008-06-02

You jive turkeys have completely missed the point. You've failed to notice that the agent is totally pretty.

Whats up with all the random pictures of unimportant shit? Trailer, click. Stop sign, click.


Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement