Let me get this straight: what Stog is saying is that Crucifried's response to this video is not implying that only Bush would have protesters taken away from his rally. Am I right? Because that sounds retarded.
Billy, the officials removing the protesters for yelling out in the audience is what I imagine to be a reasonable response that any politician would employ if someone started yelling from the audience in a rude fashion, politically charged or not.
You twisting it to say BUH OBAMA WOULDN'T DO THIS BLURR BECAUSE HE'S A LIBBO is like the crazy man response to Crucifried's over the top but not unreasonable comment, which is what I expect from you these days.
Mainly because you're a goddamn cartoon and it's fun to watch you flail.
Stog, nice job on shutting Billy up.
If only more people would see that the "neocon" arguments are ALL strawman arguments like these...then again no one reads past the headlines anymore, so that's not likely to happen.
Exactly. This administration is much more clever and insidious than fascism, because it slowly rusts away individual rights as opposed to sweeping them up romantically, all the while assuring the indoctrinating that he's only doing this to protect them from the naive Left who are trying to stop him.
Just to throw my unwanted two cents in, fascism is the government control of business, not the business control of government. What you have is the exact opposite of fascism, it is more of a kleptocracy.
