Not as good as the 1st. The cinematography is not quite as tight and anyway, the whole premise of walking around aimlessly had already been played out in the first one. The addition of a bigger budget bringing in horses and carriages and all the razzle dazzle of technology does not save a poor script.
Well I think it suffered from sequelitis. When they decided to name it "The Second Oldest Film Ever" they just decided to aim really low, and it's sad. It's sad for them.