I'd to see a versus survival show where Les and him are put in different locations several miles apart. Ending with Les finding him on the seventh day of the challenge in the bottom of a ravine with a broken leg and nearly dead of dehydration -from all the tears. That, or catching him in his hotel eating steak and watching himself on TV.

I heard Grylls was a phony. I've heard rumors that he sleeps in hotels during his "survival" shoots.

He shacks up with john cena when he's in the neighborhood.

He does get a lot of help, and a lot of it is pretty fake.

But dammit, it's entertaining.

Since when is the ability to win fear factor a respectable ability?

Since never, that's when.

1) Bear Grylls is a lot more fun to watch than Survivorman.

2) Bear Grylls used to be in the SAS. The only reason he is not in the SAS is because his parachute fucked up on a training jump and he basically fell out of the sky onto Africa. He subsequently taught his body to walk again.

I find Bear grating and his adventures unrealistic. He does insane things that would get the normal person killed, his camera crew is a license for him to be reckless. I like Les a lot more because he's pretty down to earth about his show/survival. He also plays harmonica (and sometimes guitar), which is much better than Bear's douche-tastic voice.

By fear factor, I specifically meant the bug-eating section.

Come on, you have to have tastebuds of steel to even contend, much less win.

Maybe I just like watching people eat bugs and cow testicles.

dont ever go to asia, candyass

Survivorman is a lot more entertaining than Bear Grylls. I disagree.

SAS stands for SUPER ARMY SOLDIERS

I heard Ross Kemp was in the SAS.

I don't get why people are outraged by the showboating. If Survivorman has taught me anything it's that survival is mostly a matter of not moving much, not taking risks, and being extremely patient for rare opportunity. It's kind of boring.