I had to one star this because of the description telling me not to. I'm a rebel like that. Unless it was reverse psychology, in which case I walked right into your trap.
With a name like Mr666 it's obvious you reside completely outside the lines, unlike anyone else. Nobody has ever been revolutionary enough to use 666 in their user name before.
You are one edgy hipster! Shine on, you!
Maybe he made his handle in high school and won't drop it. Even though... *giggles*
Wait, I was being serious? Note to self: next time use smiley next to message to convey aloof nature of comment.
Why is he talking like William Shatner? So.. very.. slowly.
I believe he's actually coming from the Michael Cane School there, note the turning of the head as he develops an important line, the quiet delivery that is both sobering and severe...
ENGAGE...AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
MAKE IT SO....HISTORY.
Comment. God, I'm dumb.
|wtf japan |
Aw, I was hoping this would be a Connery-esque endorsement.
I fucking love Patrick Stewart and think he is fucking adorable. Sadly this was just boring.
Also, he needs to grow his goatee back out like he had it in the movie "Jeffrey". Yum.
There seems to be some level of irony in using phrases like "it owns" in the context of anti-domestic violence video essay.
A very good point. Who is Patrick Stewart "owning" here? I'm pretty sure his whole point is that you shouldn't consider people "owning" or "owned".
I guess Patrick Stewart owned the few people who outwardly and explicitly support domestic violence. (Sean Connery, a few backwards rednecks, and the league of backwards nations)
I starred for not being....pwns.
|Poor Excuse |
Jesus Picard, have you forgotten the prime directive?!
I have that same t shirt!
|Menudo con queso |
That looked like a bit of a sardonic smirk when he mentioned "their smoking campaigns."
Is Patrick Stewart gonna have to slap a bitch!?
THIS IS WHAT A FEMINIST LOOKS LIKE.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|