Department of Human Services gets active on something like that. One of the women in question has to be the guardian or they wouldn't have taken custody.
Maybe she used the kid as a shield, maybe not. Really, what is the bounty hunter going to say, that he accidentally shot a baby, or that he only hit the baby because the kid was thrust into the line of fire?
That's his story and he's sticking to it. Apparently, no one in Oklahoma thought to ask, "Well, what the hell WERE you doing firing a taser at someone holding a baby?"
I'm going to second that suspicion. Bail bondsmen aren't famous for being exactly well-trained and upstanding members of society themselves. Easier to concoct a woman somehow managing to put a baby in the line of fire of a projectile moving at 55 meters per second[1] when someone who's firing should have a fully clear shot.
Reddit
Digg
Stumble
Facebook
