kingarthur Department of Human Services gets active on something like that. One of the women in question has to be the guardian or they wouldn't have taken custody.
Also, points for guilt before a trial.
Frank Rizzo so theres no delicious baby shocking footage?
1 star
Smellvin This is why I saw this video yesterday and didn't submit it.
Monchiles Monchiles I'm with Frank. I see a title "Woman Blocks Taser Shot With Baby" and I want to see it. Not some shitty news report about it.
Robin Kestrel Maybe she used the kid as a shield, maybe not. Really, what is the bounty hunter going to say, that he accidentally shot a baby, or that he only hit the baby because the kid was thrust into the line of fire?
kingarthur That's his story and he's sticking to it. Apparently, no one in Oklahoma thought to ask, "Well, what the hell WERE you doing firing a taser at someone holding a baby?"
Cleaner82 I imagine a Secret Service-esque scene where she dives in front of the guy all, "NOOOooOOOO--!" holding the baby out to catch the flying tazer darts.
badideasinaction I'm going to second that suspicion. Bail bondsmen aren't famous for being exactly well-trained and upstanding members of society themselves. Easier to concoct a woman somehow managing to put a baby in the line of fire of a projectile moving at 55 meters per second[1] when someone who's firing should have a fully clear shot.
Reddit
Digg
Stumble
Facebook
