|memedumpster - 2009-06-19 |
If Rush Limbaugh were a furry, he would be a...
|Adjuvant - 2009-06-19 |
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
|Huskerdu324 - 2009-06-19 |
Must have been a slow Democrat day.
I dunno. It still sounded like he was trying to blame this on liberals, somehow.
|Cena_mark - 2009-06-19 |
I'll bet most furries are liberals. At least 90%.
Nazi's aren't Republicans or Conservatives. If anything they're closer to Obama Democrats. They're statists, they bring private enterprise under government control. Just because hippies hold signs saying "Bush = Hitler" doesn't make it true.
You're probably right in all fairness being liberal means we get most of the sexual kooks whilst you get the vast majority of the homocidal/fundamentalist/'family values' ones.
Though I'll be the first to say "urgh" to Furries and zoophiles I'd rather have our situation then what your party has become. A walking joke consisting of conspirecy theory wackjobs wailing at shadows and Lettermen jokes.
Consuela the Cuban Whore
HEY LOOK ANOTHER PERSON WHO DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NAZISM/FASCISM AND A MIXED ECONOMY WOW
"They're statists, they bring private enterprise under government control."
Hardly. And the Republicans are the ones that let private enterprise run the government. Speaking of which, when are we going to see which energy executives wrote policy with Dick Cheney? How much did we piss away to Halliburton and Blackwater, again?
Jeeze, Cena, you'd think even you would be over the delusions of the past 8 years of propaganda by now.
Conservatives have a lot of closet homosexuals, it seems, as well as teenaged intern diddler-uncles, racists who use war as a solution to everything, hard core social Darwinists who hate knowledge, housewives who's dream in life is to send their sons to kill people like it's a goddamned sports team, liars who use the religious as patsies to get votes while doing nothing for them in return (which is ironically a good thing, because fuck Christians), and folks who generally lack the capacity to even understand another human being, even if that human being is in their own party and are saying the same shit they are.
On the flip-side, liberals have paid Big-Nero trillions of dollars to fiddle while America burns, way more than Haliburton and Blackwater stole, are out to reinforce the stranglehold insurance companies have on people (with little to no consequences), and have offered their constituents brilliant speeches to assuage their fears, because talk is cheap enough to where Tim Geithner doesn't want any because he can't give it to failed bankers and substandard auto-manufacturers as a reward for hating the common person.
Both sides offer so much ammo for trolling, I'm shocked at the shallowness of "Your Party = Hitler," since Hitler would have owned the everliving dogshit out of both sides' sensitive stomach interpretations of evil, exploitation, and, let's face it, media savvy. Both sides are flipper babies compared to Hitler. Hitler is beyond their very ability to even aspire to. 150,000 dead Iraqis is ridiculous compared to six million Jews and however many million Roma rounded up and exterminated. 300,000,000 people being fucked over by health insurance providers is just silly compared to blitzkrieg.
Maybe if both sides worked together and combined their evil as one front (across the aisle evil, so to speak), that might add up to two thirds a Kim Jong Ill, but saying these parties are being Hitler is like saying you have faster than light travel with a cart and a horse.
Hitler will not be topped until an honest to god supervillain takes the world hostage with antimatter weapons or something.
Except by libertarians, who are Hitler already.
I never said Nazi's were Republicans, but they most assuredly were fiscal and social conservatives. I can only guess that you learn your history from Fox News, but if you would take the time to do some study you will find that Nazi's were capitalists, and the Italian fascists were capitalists even more so.
I know that Glen Beck, Ben Stein, and other brilliant... er, whatever profession they call themselves... have been pumping this Liberal = Nazi stuff for some time, but if your slack jawed enough to fall for that then I don't see how any rational argument or facts I put forth will penetrate your skull.
In a general sense, I believe Adam O'Connell is correct. However, it's retarded to put things like "closet homosexual" and "furry" into ideological contexts.
Also, one star for all you morons taking Cena's bait.
I must admit Memedumpster summed it up real well.
Way to go Spongebob comparing shit to Nazis. Way to go.
|takewithfood - 2009-06-19 |
I was supposed to agree with that?
How is this any different than homophobia, really?
WHY YES BECAUSE RAPING ANIMALS IS THE SAME AS TWO CONSENTING ADULTS HAVING SEX
Eh, Furries creep me out but I don't really think they need to be stopped. If that's how they get off and if they're not hurting anyone then I don't give a shit.
And honestly I don't think most animal fuckers are doing much harm to those animals. I'd like to see anyone try get their dick near an animal that was being hurt or scared.
Furries are weird because it's a manufactured fetish.
No one is BORN a furry. You are born gay/straight/bi.
Being a furry is something you have to decide on. "Hey, girls won't fuck me, but if I pinned that turtle down, it would..." Boner.
It's like saying I get tumescent looking at a refrigerator. That's creepy.
For starters, claiming that all furries are into bestiality with actual animals is like saying that all gay men are pedophiles. You have to back that sort of accusation up with evidence.
Secondly, where's the evidence that it isn't a you're-born-this-way orientation? I get that it's primarily a subculture, but where is it said that it's entirely a choice?
I know hardly anything about furries but all this bullshit and bigotry sounds way too much like typical homophobia. I hope that you're all trolling me and that I'm making a huge ass out of myself for taking this seriously.
The problem isn't with the fact that people jerk off to anthropomorphic animals. Sure, that's pretty weird, but if that's all it was it'd just be another offbeat fetish. The problem is with the culture, which, again, one makes an active choice to become a part of.
Even foregoing that, the homophobia thing seems like a stretch to me, because unlike most homophobes I'm not looking to outlaw anything. If a law was passed banning furries I would only be confused and worried, because despite how obnoxious they are they really aren't hurting anyone. Obviously, I can only speak for myself, but I would guess that most of the people telling you to shut up would feel more or less the same.
What we're doing is mocking them, which we're perfectly free to do, just like they're perfectly free to dress up and make believe they're Blackfrost Darknessbadger or whatever. So quit your bellyaching.
takewithfood, it is absolutely NOT something you're born with, because sexual preference for man made costumes of minks with giant plastic eyes isn't something that could possibly be written into the genetic code. Preference for dicks and/or vagina is something that expresses in nature across the entire animal spectrum. So, unless there's some genetic state where you have a blank sexual preference until you imprint on something, it couldn't possibly be something you're born with.
And, fourthguy, you're absolutely right. Furries are creepy and unpleasant, but they're hurting no one (save for my sense of taste), so they're free to... yiff (shudder) the night away. If someone tried to outlaw them, I'd march for their rights. And shower after.
|Scrotum H. Vainglorious - 2009-06-19 |
God damn, your stupidity is beginning to rival that of Bill of TFL fame.
|Udderdude - 2009-06-19 |
You don't need to pull the "Too soon" card to hate furries.
|Cleaner82 - 2009-06-19 |
No, I still don't agree with Rush Limbaugh. I did up until the last couple seconds.
A bunch of people milling around in homemade bullshit costumes is 'too costly'? No, he just doesn't like them so he wants them to not exist, and he wants the government to make it so.
It's fine to hate people, and look, especially furries, but this knee jerk to censorship is exactly, EXACTLY what makes the man and his ilk useless. So congratulations, you found something that is harmless but that you want censored because it creeps you out that much, maybe you could head over to his studio and discuss what other types of media you want to wipe out, I'm sure there would be more if you just gave it a think.
|yourmother - 2009-06-20 |
I hate furries as much as the next person, but I hate the fact that he's trying to imply that people shouldn't have strange sex or spend money on weird stuff when there's a war on.
I'm trying so hard not to imagine what sort of weird and expensive sex stuff Rush Limbaugh is into. Blargh.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|