|zatojones - 2009-06-30 |
also full of shit
|Pillager - 2009-06-30 |
Whatever keeps the population down...
|Iakchos - 2009-06-30 |
yay propaganda using manipulated footage
|Udderdude - 2009-06-30 |
That's pretty hot, actually.
|jaunch - 2009-06-30 |
You know, I agree that it's BS in terms of the baby screaming or knowing it is about to be killed. *but*, as much of a liberal, jaded individual as I am, I just think abortion's wrong. In cases of rape or medical emergency, go right ahead. But otherwise, no thanks.
yes that's fine, but the issue is about letting everyone make their own decision isn't it?
THA SUGAH RAIN
Zatojones, That is the equivalent argument as saying "I think murder/hockey/stealing/rape/recycling is wrong, but really it should be a personal choice, I dont like it so Im not going to do it, but its up to other people to make up their own minds" When someone believes that something is absolutely morally wrong, it does not translate to leave it up to personal choice.
I am pro-choice.
I agree with RAIN re: personal choice. And you know, I used to be pro-choice, too. But as I got older I guess I got more conservative. Don't get me wrong: I'm as much of a liberal commie socialist queer as the next guy. I'm atheist and happen to despise almost every conservative politician I've ever heard speak. And I know that most abortions are done when the fetus is little more than a blob of gunk. But even still, eh... I just can't get down with it.
It's a mistake to assume that pro-choice advocates are somehow happy about abortion and don't think there's anything disturbing about it. It plays into the typical "pro-abortion" characterization that the other side likes to use.
You can be bothered by abortion and not agree with it and still support the legal right for people to have it based on a deeper and more complex understanding of why human beings need to take control of their own reproductive rights, despite it's uncomfortable aspects at times, and why it's important that abortion be safe and legal.
The great thing about being pro-choice is that you can choose to hate abortions and think they're wrong. Like me, I would never have or perform an abortion, unless maybe it was to save someone's life.
|TeenerTot - 2009-06-30 |
Published by Rosary Films? Then it must be totally factual and completely unbiased.
|chumbucket - 2009-06-30 |
sorely disappointed at 0:34 when the lame music started in. I don't know what I was thinking, I guess hoping there would be SOME level of objectivity and "science" here.
was the camera lens covered with amniotic ooze for the extent of this feature?
|themilkshark - 2009-06-30 |
The last place I'd look for valuable opinions on abortion would be POETV, a site populated by predominately white males who have more sexual experience with jpegs than actual women (I'm included in that assumption). Abortion sucks and the women who need them already feel plenty of guilt about it, it's an ugly truth and necessity in our society, JUST LIKE WARS AND EXPENSIVE HEALTHCARE.
|glasseye - 2009-06-30 |
Propaganda from the radical religious right.
|StanleyPain - 2009-06-30 |
Already debunked years and years ago.
Really? Where at? Not calling anyone out, just interested.
I'm not going to do the Google Fu right now, but basically when it became obvious the film was produced by anti-abortion types, obviously it came under scientific scrutiny. When investigated, basically it came out that the footage had been doctored in numerous ways to elicit an emotional response from viewers, most notably in changing the speed of the footage (slowing down or speeding up). The whole thing is also, obviously, framed from an anti-abortion perspective and presents a side of things that is not supported by any well established doctors or medical scientists. IN other words, it isn't an objective examination of abortion, obviously. So, maybe "debunked" was the wrong term, but the film has been widely discredited.
|MaulLove - 2009-06-30 |
I hate to join a 1 star gangbang, but this is ridiculous.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|