| 73Q Music Videos | Vote On Clips | Submit | Login   |
Desc:Men stay just as ugly as ever
Category:Science & Technology, News & Politics
Tags:women, chicks, broads, skirts, baby makers
Submitted:fatatty
Date:07/29/09
Views:1434
Rating:
View Ratings
Register to vote for this video

People Who Liked This Video Also Liked:
Michael Winslow performs a killer Led Zeppelin cover
Hard Gay vs New Ying Ling Sama
GARBAGE DAY!!
Taped rant of a social studies teacher in Florida
Lady Spins on Escalator
The Cookie Carnival
Sea Level Rise is accelerating
Man releases mouse
Randy Quaid Fucks Rupert Murdoch
TENGA - Eggs
Comment count is 17
mashedtater - 2009-07-29
"a successful man is able to better take care of a woman and her offspring..whatever that means."

if you dont comprehend that, well..frankly i am worried. it is not a phrase that is hard to understand.



THA SUGAH RAIN - 2009-07-29
It means that scientists agree that "success" in life is measured by the man's ability to make money and the woman's ability to have sex and make babies.

Riskbreaker - 2009-07-29
If that's the case, then evolution is not working properly where i live.
Smellvin - 2009-07-29
Can Fox run something where they implicitly accept evolution? Won't that risk angering their fan-base?
takewithfood - 2009-07-29
Any anger was countered by pictures of swimsuit models.

Bort - 2009-07-29
This is an example of microevolution. Macroevolution -- where monkeys turn into people and Czechs turn into cockroaches -- is a myth. (Actually they're technically right that macroevolution is a myth, but not for the reasons they think it is.)

Witty_Pop_Culture_Reference - 2009-07-29
Please do not elucidate your thoughts when you have no real understanding of the words you are using. Read more.

pastorofmuppets - 2009-07-30
I don't really see what was wrong with that, when you take the humor into account. I believe Bort was saying that when people say "microevolution happens but macroevolution doesn't", they are misusing the terms.

Evolution is evolution. Macro- and micro- can refer to different time scales, but context is required. So when people say that macroevolution is a myth, they are ironically perpetuating the myth that these terms refer to separate processes. And they are assuming that what constitutes a "species" is always clear.

Bort - 2009-07-30
pastorofmuppets, you are correct. "Microevolution" and "macroevolution" essentially mean "examples of evolution we cannot deny" and "examples of evolution we want to deny", which is to say, "macroevolution" is a garbage concept. There's just evolution.

Walt Henderson - 2009-07-29
This phenomenon has my full approval.
takewithfood - 2009-07-29
It is true because "scientists" did "research". That is all you need to know.

JOURNALISM!
Desidiosus - 2009-07-29
I would like a government grant to study swimsuit and lingerie models. Where do I apply?
Scrotum H. Vainglorious - 2009-07-29
This means more men will be forced into TFL.


memedumpster - 2009-07-29
The League of Plastic Surgical Artists will not stand for this genetic threat to their profits. Breed, uglies, breeeeeeed!!!
Camonk - 2009-07-29
Don't worry, man. Wisconsin is on this like stink on shit. Nothin' but fat, squishy white people makin' ugly babies.

fatatty - 2009-07-29
Wait...this isn't an Onion skit?
pastorofmuppets - 2009-07-30
Sometimes scientists do really dumb studies with scant evidence to back them up. Not everyone's cut out for the Nobel-earning stuff.

Of course, it's precisely that stuff that ends up on the "news" every day.

Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement