But I acknowledge that it sort of a guilty pleasure. Like watching Mike Tyson punch a pregnant woman in the gut. I mean you have this lady who's basically psychotic and she's arguing with a Royal Society Fellow.
The nice thing about Dawkins is there's a certain kind of response only a Brit could pull off, and it's called for throughout this interview. 2:00 in this part is a good example.
William Burns She just doesn't use punctuation, excepting the words UHHM and UHH.
pastorofmuppets This would be a good thing to watch for a class in informal logic or rhetoric. It follows a simple pattern...he says "have you seen the fossils?" and she counters with a fallacy designed to change the subject.
Also, by her logic, since the Shroud of Turin dates back to 1300, that lady needs a new Messiah.
IMO she does, but that's neither here nor there.
Deplorable Evolution is so dangerous the knowledge of the very concept is so societally damaging that nothing but full denial and mind-warping will protect from it. Maybe if we collectively think happy thoughts we won't destroy each other in an animalistic godless rage!