| 73Q Music Videos | Vote On Clips | Submit | Login   |

Help keep poeTV running


And please consider not blocking ads here. They help pay for the server. Pennies at a time. Literally.



Comment count is 23
Robin Kestrel - 2009-08-26

"And even that one was of questionable status."


chairsforcheap - 2009-08-26

when the british-folk make with the ten-dollar-words it makes muh laugh-gut go gawwww fawww fawwwww


Stog - 2009-08-26

I HATE THIS MAN SO MUCH I AM GOING TO COMMENT ON OTHER PEOPLE WHO LIKE HIM

HEY

HEY YOU

YOU'RE A POO

BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURN


chairsforcheap - 2009-08-26

stog, me and you are going to have a buddy flick, whether you like it or not.


kelpfoot - 2009-08-26

Hausdorff dimension (and Minkowski dimension and box-counting dimension) all allow you to have non-integer dimensions. As an example, a "2.5 dimensional space" could mean that you have a fractal-looking thing, that contains every single point in some particular, continuous subset of 2D space, and that encloses 50% of all possible points in some particular, continuous subset of 3D space.

Warning: Do not attempt to visualize 2.5 dimensional space.


chairsforcheap - 2009-08-26

hey guess what internet narcissist, nobody cares about what you majored in


chairsforcheap - 2009-08-26

translation: wish i thought of that!


chairsforcheap - 2009-08-26

nice translating, dad!


SteamPoweredKleenex - 2009-08-27

Why would someone reply to themselves over multiple posts?


SteamPoweredKleenex - 2009-08-27

Dunno. I think it's a sign of mental breakdown. Or boredom. Or terrorism... maybe.


SteamPoweredKleenex - 2009-08-27

Poor guy. Hope he'll be alright.


MongoMcMichael - 2009-08-27

IT'S LIKE I CAN TOUCH YOU!


Cleaner82 - 2009-08-26

I naturally assumed '2.5D Hoedown' was the name of a game and was sorely disappointed.


Caminante Nocturno - 2009-08-26

You can't have half a dimension you idiots.


kelpfoot - 2009-08-26

Imagine the line segment [0,1). I want you to divide this segment into four equal parts, [0,.25), [.25,.5), [.5,.75), and [.75,1). Remove the third segment, [.5,75), and leftover you have [0,.25), [.25,.5), [.75,1).

For each of the three segments you have left over, I want you to do the same thing as before: divide it into four equal segments, and remove the third segment.

Let's give a name to each of those sets we came up with. Let X0 be [0,1), let X1 be [0,.25) U [.25,.5) U [.75,1), let X2 be [0,.125) U [.1875,.25) U ..., et cetera, with Xn being the set you have left over after the nth iteration of the procedure I described. Let X be defined as the limit, as n approaches infinity, of Xn. This set, X, has "box-counting" dimension 0.5, because if you imagine any random line segment of very short length, (and that line segment is between 0 and 1,) there is a fifty percent chance the segment contains a point from X and a fifty percent chance it does not.

Also, you're a pedophile.


Tuan Jim - 2009-08-26

5 for kelpfoot


EyeViolence - 2009-08-27

+1 for kelpfoot


Xenocide - 2009-08-27

-500 FOR KELPFOOT.

Note that in the Kelpfoot dimension, removing stars leads to an increase in the total number of stars.


Billie_Joe_Buttfuck - 2009-08-26

All stars for the ending.


chairsforcheap - 2009-08-26

not one joke attempt made me crack a smile


Syd Midnight - 2009-08-27

I laughed at the thought of making level designers cry by abusing the physics engine. Not one of his best but a pretty good review.


StanleyPain - 2009-08-26

That's it? No Trials HD or Shadow Complex? For shame, Yahtzee....for shame.


RockBolt - 2009-08-26

Kassblah


Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement