|takewithfood - 2009-12-06 |
|HarrietTubmanPI - 2009-12-06 |
You know, this 'climategate' is really bringing the McExperts out of the woodwork. The good side of this is that the deniers are now even more obliviously using the same arguments over and over again - so it makes them look pretty silly.
This yet another McExpert who has no idea what he's talking about.
This video almost needs a Jump to Conclusions mat.
It's a tiny gripe, but I don't get this McExpert term. Did potholer start that? "Mc" implies that something is mass-produced or fits a mold. But people are traditionally made in small batches. You could say that it's because they all think the same but that's kind of a stretch. "Armchair expert" gets the point across much better. Although we may need to update it to "webcam expert" or something like that.
|fermun - 2009-12-06 |
What I love is that these people are the kind of people that always go on about how if a business does something wrong or something you don't like, don't go through them. An editor published a paper which was skeptical of global warming without having gone through the peer review process. Dude goes through a futile effort to prevent journals which sometimes publish papers that aren't peer reviewed as being defined as a peer reviewed journal in the IPCC annual report. He tried to get people to stop submitting to or citing the journal until the editor responsible was fired.
This is not abusing the peer review process or evidence of a global conspiracy. This is evidence of one douchey scientist trying to make a stand to stop a douchey editor from fucking with a journal.
|Burnov - 2009-12-06 |
Quack quack quack
|Syd Midnight - 2009-12-06 |
ALL THIS GLOBAL WARMING NONSENSE WOULD END IF WE KICK THE DEMONCRATS OUT OF OFFICE. BECASE THEY ARE FULOL OF HOT AIR.
|pastorofmuppets - 2009-12-06 |
What's all this about journals? These scientists expect to be taken seriously while writing in diaries?
Dear diary: said my atheist prayers today, which is what I call drinking a six pack of Miller High Life in 10 minutes or less and then beating my kid. The next time I catch him reading the Bible I'm going to ground him for a month. Also, I love being a godless humanist because it means I can do whatever I want, including cheating on my wife with teenage hookers and paying them with counterfeit money.
|memedumpster - 2009-12-06 |
I would feel more indulgent of this whole debate if it were philosophical and didn't have like a billion lives hanging in the balance.
Five for the affluent indulgence of human lives as political game mechanic evil.
|Toenails - 2009-12-06 |
I for one, cannot wait until potholer54 scrutinizes the other emails. It will be interesting to see what a flame war between scientists looks like.
|John Holmes Motherfucker - 2009-12-06 |
Hey, wait a minute, I know this guy! It's the "How the World Works" guy. Say, he really IS a loathesome douchebag! Check out one of his videos in the sidebar where he delivers his trademark creepy stare into the camera. No, seriously, when this guy stares into the camera, it is creep-pay! Like Criswell in the beginning of "Plan 9 ", but without the warmth.
This one is relentless, He did a seven part rebuttal (maybe more, I only saw the first minute of part 7) to some other you-tube guy who called himself "Liberal Viewer" He was out to prove that Liberal Viewer was "deliberately misleading when he said that the current healthcare legislation did not mandate" a single payer system. well, that was deliberately misleading because the bill featured many "single-payer aspects".
Single payer aspects. Hmmmm... Single payer aspects. WTF, "SINGLE PAYER ASPECTS?!!?" It's like he's making up his own language. "Single-payer" only has ONE aspect, Poindexter. Can you guess what that is?
Rush Limbaugh "Strawman of the Century?" I must admit, I've always thought so, but traditionally, a strawman is not an actual person.
|Keefu - 2009-12-06 |
The host of the The New Young Turks beat this guy in a debate once. That's how bad this guy is.
|John Holmes Motherfucker - 2009-12-06 |
I've never really seen the "New Young Turks", except for a few clips. If they brought this guy on, it must suck ass.
I'm sure this guy thinks he has a philosophy, but he's really all about the psychology. Seriously, check out one of his talking head videos, and look into his eyes. You can't miss the desperation. He's not really interested in proving liberals wrong. He needs to prove them to be deceitful and immoral, and I think he lives in fear of what will happen to his world if he can't. I mean, he sure looks like he's afraid of SOMETHING. What's more, he can never stop proving it. Seven part rebuttals to some other YouTube douchebag are bad enough, but he can't stop to take a breath. Seriously, the more I think about it, the less I feel like i should be mocking him, and the more I wish there was some way I could help him. But frankly, I think he's going to kill somebody someday, and it'll probably be the person who tries to help him... so, never mind.
|Konversekid - 2009-12-06 |
This guy is a giant bitch! He personally calls out Potholer54 to respond yet this isn't even a linked response to the original video; it's a response to some address of Obama.
|pastorofmuppets - 2009-12-07 |
I love when he says "then he also brings in lunatics like Alex Jones" because if you watch the original (or the pundit clips it features) you can see that they all say the exact same thing. Maybe Alex Jones is a lunatic, and maybe Rush isn't, but you certainly can't tell from their respective coverage of this.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|