Caminante Nocturno - 2009-12-06
This is going to end up being a local news story where the reporters and anchors have incredulous looks on their faces.
|
|
splatterbabble - 2009-12-06
This is a two hour tip from where I live and I have that day off.
Too bad I have a habit of not flying to the defense of sex offenders.
|
|
StanleyPain - 2009-12-06 To a certain extent, I would like to agree, only what he was doing was clearly against his terms as a registered sex offender. I agree that his punishment should not be overkill, but on the same token, there's good reasons that sex offenders have guidelines and requirements placed on their release and I think, personally, it would be kinda lame to let this guy slide just because of his personable YouTube side.
|
splatterbabble - 2009-12-06 All I'm saying is, if one of the terms of his release were have that damned tooth fixed, I could be prompted to show up.
Florida really is a weird place.
|
|
|
oddeye - 2009-12-06 Just because "have gotten away with far more heinous things and got off sheerly because they are entertaining to the public (see: many celebrities)" doesn't mean he should get free reign to break the terms of his release
He should be destroyed in my opinion but barring that he should face the full consequences of knowingly breaking said terms.
|
baleen - 2009-12-06
I thought he was arrested for diddling a kid back in 1981 or whatever, but I guess he just banged some guy.
|
mashedtater - 2009-12-06
if i could, id suppose id go
|
Syd Midnight - 2009-12-06
Yeah the law is probably being way too harsh on him but you gotta do your own time. This isn't about whether he's a sexual predator, it's about whether he violated the terms of his release. He did. Sucks for him but thems the rules.
|
Register or login To Post a Comment |