Er, sense, not send

I gotta agree with you. Even when I saw the film the first time, I noticed the smoke (from the piston) coming out of the bottom of the trailer.

Still, 5 stars for seeing exactly how they did that unnecessary & distracting stunt.

Whereas I quite like hearing about the science involved. Giant piston? Fantastic! I love seeing how thing happen. The only thing is, that explains the plume of smoke from the bottom of the trailer that I previously didn't understand being there. It's like closure for me, though, and that is just me.

Yeah, fuck stunts in action movies. I hate those.

"I'm okay with suspending my disbelief for a plot element, but not for action sequences"

You caught us. Although it may have appeared that we were complaining about a particular incongruous (and poorly executed) stunt, we were secretly hating on all stunts ever done.

Actually it just sounds like you're both idiots.

Hint: anytime you're agreeing with splatterbabble, you need to take a step back and seriously examine your life.

I didn't see the movie but I find it a bit odd that they apparently didn't edit out the smoke plume.

'On Golden Pond' could have used a truck flipping scene.

Yes, yes it could have.

Comic book movies should stick to entertaining their primary market with kids movies and tv shows.

This movie was trying SO HARD to make some profound statement.