|wtf japan - 2010-06-09 |
Why hasn't anyone sued Taitz for defamation? Her entire "career" is based on easily controvertible defamatory statements against government officials.
|jangbones - 2010-06-09 |
is it "Orly Taitz, Esq., DDS" or "Orly Taitz, DDS, Esq."?
|NewHeavenSalesman - 2010-06-09 |
Wait, is that Plinko's knit cap?
MANY WORLDS ARE INTERSECTING HERE. NOT HAPPY, SEND HELP.
If that is Plinko's hat, we should start treating him with more respect. How many of his whiny detractors have made such an enchanting chapeau?
Plinko will get more respect when he stops channeling the worst parts of Feyd and gives up trying to defeat THE CHATOCRACY every time ygurts and FMA post something.
|MaulLove - 2010-06-09 |
I fucking love you man. I am so donating.
|RockBolt - 2010-06-09 |
Donation page link: http://kck.st/9lD3su
|Lurchi - 2010-06-09 |
|Cleaner82 - 2010-06-09 |
Fight the good fight!
|love - 2010-06-09 |
|Cena_mark - 2010-06-09 |
How can the guy get sued for a satirical painting? Fucking birthers!
|boner - 2010-06-09 |
|eatenmyeyes - 2010-06-09 |
see Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
The judge should order her to have "12(b)(6)" tattooed on her forehead for future reference.
You know, I'm pretty certain that Taitz's attorneys are going to be savvy enough in their actions to avoid falling for the most obvious trap in all of law.
It's more likely (as is the case with horrible litigious folks) that she's hardly expecting to win anything, but instead drain Lacey's resources for the sheer malicious fun of it.
I assumed that she was representing herself.
Yeah, I stand corrected. According to the wiki, she's already been fined for Rule 11 shenanigans.
Bear in mind (something I didn't realize until today) that she got like 23% of the vote for California Secretary of State, which sounds pretty comforting until you realize it's not comforting at all.
|BHWW - 2010-06-09 |
Most conspiracy theorists are basically con artists dumb or crazy enough to fall for their own cons, and I feel Taitz is defintely in the latter category.
|kingofthenothing - 2010-06-09 |
They've got no case. It's parody, man. Plus, he sells his work on Ebay, it's not like people hire him out for some kind of agenda.
|Bored - 2010-06-09 |
I can't believe he is promoting the Plinko hat like all the time now.
|StanleyPain - 2010-06-09 |
To clarify, he's not being sued for the paintings. She's trying to get a court to order him to reveal who is supposedly SHADOW-FUNDING him for these paintings so she can then in turn sue George Soros or whoever for a conspiracy to harass her.
Man, Soros sure gets around what with funding....well, everything in the entire world remotely leftist.
|ShiftlessRastus - 2010-06-09 |
Please make Kieth Olberman aware of this. You'll have your funding in no time.
|Rodents of Unusual Size - 2010-06-09 |
Fuck this circus freak cunt. Fuck her hard, Dan. With a crowbar.
|CornOnTheCabre - 2010-06-10 |
who would've thought Orly Taitz would sink so low as to file a frivolous lawsuit
oh shit, do you think we're all gonna get sued for this thread?
|Hubba Bubba Nightmare - 2010-06-10 |
5 for Dan
|oddeye - 2010-06-10 |
Can't he recover the legal costs from Orly as part of the court procedings if he wins?
| Register or login To Post a Comment|