| 73Q Music Videos | Vote On Clips | Submit | Login   |
Desc:How to turn a sphere inside out, topology for the masses! Long, but worth it.
Category:Educational
Tags:math, topology, turning number
Submitted:gmol
Date:05/06/11
Views:883
Rating:
View Ratings
Register to vote for this video
Favorited 2 Times
Resubmit:fluffy

People Who Liked This Video Also Liked:
Siskel & Ebert outtakes - 'McDonald's'
Space Shuttle SRB Recovery Ships in Action
Woman fakes injury in court
Homely Girl Stare
Royce Gracie's Return to MMA
Moonsault off the Fat Guy
mike o'mally piza gimme a dollar
Willard Scott is the Grandpa You Always Wanted
Animals being shot
Hans Moleman
Simian Pride
Awesome!
freedoom
why would you want to turn a sphere inside out?
Chalkdust
now I don't want to do anything else!

dancingshadow
To get at all that sweet purple

jangbones
the sexual tension between Infomercial Joe and GLaDOS is staggering
Robert DeNegro
FAKE!
erratic
Why can't you crease the surface? Is it an arbitrary complication for chronic mathturbators or will it break the universe?
Cyberblah
Yes. I trust that there's a mathematical reason why you can't, but my first instinct was that it's just a bullshit rule to make things hard.

GravidWithHate
I'd guess that the equation describing the surface has to be continuous and differentiable.

If I'm remembering my math right, that means if you measure the slope of the surface at any given point, and then create a graph of the slope, the graph must be a smooth line or curve with no gaps. A crease or tear creates a point where the slope will suddenly jump from one value to another, or where the slope is undefined.

I don't know why this is necessary, as I never got this far, but I'd further guess that discontinuous curves do nasty things to whatever transformation functions they're using.

gmol
The "no creases" (or corners) constraint is there because the result isn't counter intuitive without it.

The constraint has to do with "immersions", that is a maps between spaces that are bi continuous and whose derivatives are injective (don't map two points to the same corner/crease).

Chalkdust
It makes sense to me but I'm not sure how well I can explain it... that little pinchy loop would just be getting infinitely smaller and smaller but never actually "snapping" around to the other side.

Redlof
Because a system that uses creases isn't useful for modeling the curvature of space time. So I guess that means maybe the Universe would break?

gmol
What are you guys talking about?

It is simple to create function that introduces creases into a volume; that's the problem, it is simple. If we don't care abou the constraint, the solution to "everting" the sphere would just be to pull it through itself and no one would care.

When we do introduce the "no creases" constraint, most of us end up being very surprised that it is possible (as this video shows it is); and that's why this is interesting.

Why does anyone care? It is interesting in the same way other neat little mathematical facts are interesting e.g. there are more irrational numbers than there are natural numbers.

Billy the Poet
It's in the part of the Torah that nobody reads.

pastorofmuppets
In my limited research experience, the answer for "why is that constraint there" has always been "so I'd have a problem to solve."

Triggerbaby
HOW ABOUT A HYPERSPHERE HUH? HOW ABOUT THAT SMART GUY?
TheSupafly
I can't believe this video managed to get me to understand this.
Comeuppance
I can't believe that I sat through a 20-minute video, with rapt attention, explaining how to do something - within the constraints of arbitrary rules - to a solely hypothetical object.

Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement