Can't wait for the youtube comments to really pick up. So far there's just a couple of credulous shmucks and somebody saying that it would take some time to make a fake this good. I guess ten years isn't long enough for them?
It would take about 20 minutes in AfterFX.
It has never been "admitted" because it has always been just a truther wet dream.
See, I don't really pay much attention to this stuff since there's actual, real stuff happening in the world right now, and the result is I've heard more about WTC from this site than from any other source and it's starting to blur together. Uh oh.
I think "truther" is my favourite conspiracy theory, because more than any other, it involves such a random assortment of evil genius and abject stupidity from whoever they want to claim is behind it. Also, no motive.
Counterpoint: more people I otherwise respect believe this stuff than all other conspiracy theories COMBINED.
I choose to respect overly credulous potheads who make good music.
|split tail |
It's not fake! All other videos of WTC 7 have been altered!
They could have least used a different sound effects CD than the on they used for Quake.
This looks like a job for Jesse 'The Body' Ventura!
Also, surely a building cannot be demolished by taking out two floors with explosives, that would be like a pair of cars and one is a VW bug and the other is a bus and
Here let me google that for you:
This is a power supply outburst going on inside the building. Watch any demolition video on yt, this doesn't look like a detonation at all.
I think we should let dancingshadow be the judge of that, don't you?
I don't know what those are. Maybe the video's fake.
"World trade center 7 collapsed due to fire fueled by office furnishings. It did not collapse from explosives or fuel oil fires."
That's what some NIST guy said in some presentation.
Office furniture on fire. An entire concrete and steel building, woosh in to the ground cause of burning desks and chairs. Never happened before, will never again. Physically impossible for countless reasons.
But yeah, that the reason given. Take it or leave it.
So what is more likely? That fire damage to the building caused it to collapse in an anomalous way, or that it was intentionally destroyed as part of a huge conspiracy at the highest levels of government to initiate a false flag operation, despite the fact that this could have been accomplished with the collapse of even just ONE of the WTC towers?
I knew we could count on you. Also, it was partially fire and partially the massive damage caused by WTC 1 & 2 collapsing right next to it.
But, you know, it probably is just a huge mystery. Why would a huge fire and massive damage to one corner of a building cause it to fall down?
You know, dancingshadow, I'm starting to think you're trolling. More than enough people around here have pointed out how everything you've said about 9/11 is wrong. Either you have no ability to critically assess information that's being presented to you, or you're just a bored troll. I watched (and believed) enough conspiracy videos to know that they're constantly harping on about "doing your own research" so why not try that?
I'll give you some fun places to start: find out at which temperature your average fire burns, and then find out at which temperature steel loses 50% of it's strength. Not where it melts, mind you. Just where it gets weaker. And maybe sit down and watch the video of the NIST report on WTC 7. Maybe watch some videos of controlled demolitions and compare/contrast them to videos of the WTC buildings falling.
And here's some interesting information that I found out, I'll save you the research: Thermite (as I hope you know) is composed of iron and aluminum oxides, maybe with a bit of sulfur thrown in for kicks. Guess where those things are in heavy abundance?? If you said the inside of an office building which has just been hit by a 767, a winner is you!!!
Man, 9/11 sure did produce a lot of engineers and demolition experts.
As much as I hate truthers, the Building 7 collapse (or more accurately the decision to just let it collapse ) at least carries more weight as a conspiracy theory since the destruction of the building did indeed destroy a lot of evidence against many Wall Street firms who were under investigation, not the least of which was WorldCom.
Yep, but that wouldn't be a case for a 9/11 conspiracy per se. Truthers use building 7 as one of their main "arguments" to support the idea that the twin towers were blow up with explosives. You just won't move them from that point.
|Caminante Nocturno |
Obviously caused by rascally children with a bag of illegal fireworks and a dreadful lack of adult supervision. That much is a given, but now you all have to ask yourselves a scary question: How many ragamuffins does it take to collapse the WTC towers, and who has the power to control that many rambunctious little hoodlums?
Well, if Vladimir Putin and Brent Spiner worked together... but how would they?.. OH Dear Lord !!!
"Adding comments has been disabled for this video".
This. This is the troll foretold of in the scriptures.
This is a viral video for the Star Trek the Star Trek sequel. It was Klingons.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|