One honest statement in the whole 8 mins;
"I live in a bubble"
I thought you were making a completely absurdest comment, but no, he actually said that.
OBAMA'S TEAM SUPPRESSED VOTER TURNOUT
BY TELLING VOTERS NOT TO VOTE FOR THE OTHER GUY.
If only Romney could have known about this revolutionary (and no doubt unconstitutional) new political technique. I think the liberals call it "campaigning" or something. Anyway, this is grounds to impeach Obama, sign my petition.
Its fun to be on the winning side this time. Thank you POETV for helping make this transformation. If not for you I'd be as sad and confused as these dorks.
Not to knock your progress, Cena ol' buddy, but seeing as Obama spent the lat four years being virtually indistinguishable from Bush, siding with him wasn't much of a transformation.
The more things change...!
You mean apart from banning abortion, cutting taxes for the rich, doing anything on the healthcare front, tying disaster relief to budget cuts, banning gay marriage, etc., right?
Seriously, he's not perfect, and the drone strikes need to stop, but saying he's "just like Bush" is about as insightful as calling him a poopy-head.
If Obama is too far right for you, you need to move to France.
Kleenex- Oh, yeah, sorry. Silly me. I just plumb forgot about that time Bush "banned abortion" and "banned gay marriage". Because those things totally happened. Just like Obama closing Gitmo and that time he decided to pull out of Iraq right away, not just in time for the election and only because the Iraqi government wasn't going to give us immunity from war crimes prosecution. HOPE AND CHANGE.
Cena- Atta boy. There's the Cena we love!
Cena- so, what? He "adopted" Libya? He adopted Yemen? I suppose next he's going to be "adopting" Iran from some parallel universe where Rimney won.
And nevermind the fact that Obama's track record on "gay marriage" has been less than lukewarm. Nevermind either that I, personally, don't care about gay marriage itself so much as the underlying issue of whether the government has any right to legislate consensual activities at all (the Dems, like the Reps, want to keep that right on the table). The last thing of any real substance Obama did vis a vis gay marriage was indicate his support for handing the matter over to the states. No shit. Here's an allegedly black New Leftist pitching "states rights" in regards to the fundamental civil rights of a full tenth of the country.
Christ, I'm not even thirty yet, and I'm already a bigger cynical cunt than my father.
For some reason this thread made me think of Romney with an H on his forehead and that made me laugh.
Don't be cynical, EvilHomer, you have to see the voter from Obama's point of view. You look something like this :
We all look like that. Nothing else. Ever.
Unless you look like :
Then, he loves you and wants you back. Our president is less complicated than the machines used to elect him. He also left union busting to states rights.
Dammit GoodPeterGriffin, you're starting to sound like a Paultard. No matter who we elect we're still Americans and we fight for the rights of every man. We did what we had to in Libya and Yeman, and what do you mean his record on gay marriage is lukewarm. He's the first fuckin' president to support it. I don't care if he didn't in the past, he supports it now. He supported before the election. Respect the man, he has balls.
a fun thing to do while watching the video is to rhythmically glance between the eyes on the douche to the left and the eyes of the douche in the middle. Do this until their facial features lose all meaning and association.
The comments are full of the worst reaction the GOP has when it loses. It's not that their candidates were nuts, favored the rich, have prehistoric beliefs about science and women, etc. It's the VOTERS that were stupid, lazy, immature, and so on.
It's like listening to a crappy musician going on about how it's not his work that sucks, it's that the rest of the world doesn't recognize his genius.
So, if voter suppression doesn't help your candidate win, it was definitely because the other side utilized much better voter suppression. Obviously you can't win elections with votes, you have to take away votes to win, right?
Wait, I shouldn't be asking DIY conservative pundits anything about winning elections.
Every time I'm with my FOX news watching father and bring up some shitty thing the Republican party has done, he always counters with THE OTHER SIDE DOES THE SAME THING!
Even with the voter suppression tricks like robocall/flier misinformation and intimidation. If someone can show me even one of those aimed at suppressing conservative turnout I will personally eat them and record it for youtube.
Eat the fliers I meant!
As soon as I saw three white men with fake hair talking on the screen I knew that's what they did wrong
Ha ha ha!
I still can't decide if this means the Repub party enters the 21st century, or goes back to old policies EVEN HARDER.
I'm hopeful they're on the final escalator down into the forgotten vaults of political history.
From this video and the last video featuring these douches, I can tell they are very self important.
I haven't seen guys who love to dickride republicans so much since I stumbled into that gay bar called the "Elephant's trunk."
I never thought Kerry was going win, and neither did anyone else that I can remember, and he lost by a narrower margin than Romney did.
I don't understand how people could have gone into November 6th with such supreme confidence that Romney, a candidate didn't take the lead in the election race once, was going to win.
I've read a few theories about that and the best I can tell is that the Romney campaign and Fox News were getting high on their own supply.
Of course you tell the rubes it's a close race: you need them to watch your shows so you can make money. But after lying for so long, after saying that the current polling is skewed and it's massively oversampling democrat voters, you forget that it's all bullshit and start to really believe it.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|