| 73Q Music Videos | Vote On Clips | Submit | Login   |

Reddit Digg Stumble Facebook
Desc:Creation Today calls out Pat Robertson for admitting the Earth isn't 6,000 years old.
Category:Religious, Horror
Tags:creationism, christians, Pat Roberston, Creation Today, parade of idiots
Submitted:SteamPoweredKleenex
Date:11/07/13
Views:903
Rating:
View Ratings
Register to vote for this video

People Who Liked This Video Also Liked:
A special happy birthday to Bret Michaels!
Batman v Spiderman
The King of Clean Comedy
Forgotten sports - Blindfolded boxing
'Angry' police confront street preacher about bullhorn
The reindeer from 'Santa Claus' (1959)
Kids In The Hall Brain Candy - Alternative Ending
33 Year old Marcus Johnson was asked to turn his music down...
Family First (Part1) - Fire by Nite #41
viral marketing for the upcoming Robocop remake
Comment count is 18
Kabbage
Awww shieeeee~ we got ourselves a holier than thoudown motherfuckerssssss
EvilHomer
I really don't know who to root for here. Obviously, Pat is in the right - or at least more in the right than Eric and his Limey buddy there - but YEC Christians are much easier to take down than scientific ecumenicals, and the more Hovind mainstreams his viewpoint, the easier it will be for people to smell the bullshit.


You can find the full episode in the description, but I'll warn you now, it's mostly just them trying to sell crap to their viewers. Also, fuck Apple and it's product placement. From now on, I'm associating MacBooks with grown men who believe Jesus rode dinosaurs.
memedumpster
I am personally opposed to improving the image of Apple enthusiasts by associating them with Christian levels of reason and humility.

yogarfield
logically, there is only one way to decide between the two. drill a glory hole through two identical bibles and hang a bible on their erect members, while forcing them to watch a liveleak montage of muslims being sniped. first to drop their bible loses.

Hooker
How can someone spend so much time on this? I have more respect for Star Wars nerds.
Hooker
That goes for atheists that spend large amounts of their time trying to prove God doesn't exist / God is unknowable as well.

memedumpster
You can't prove a negative, it's logically impossible. The atheists you know who try are slack jawed retards.

SteamPoweredKleenex
The atheists I know are more concerned with the god-botherers trying to get the tenets of their hokum enshrined in the laws of the land.

ashtar.
You can prove a negative.

Logically, it's not any harder to establish the truth or falseness of (not A) than (A). Empirically, a hypothesis being falsifiable is pretty much a precondition for it being considered scientific.

You can't really prove that God exists (or not) because "God" is defined such that no evidence could possibly tell you either way.

You can try to prove God exists conceptually (Anselm, Aquinas), but all such proofs have had great big holes kicked in them (Immanuel Kant). Anyway, even if you think they do work, what they manifestly do *not* prove is anything like the christian personal God that these idiots think cares primarily about what you do with your dick.

memedumpster
So you can prove that someone didn't do something?

Syd Midnight
Its what happens when your faith and beliefs are so incredibly weak that reality itself disproves them.

takewithfood
You know you're a completely worthless person when, of all the stupid things Pat Robertson has said, THAT'S the one you take issue with.
pyslexic dharmacist
The only solution to this debate is to burn both factions at the stake and let god sort 'em out.
Xenagama Warrior Princess
*shouts on playground*

DUMBTARD FIIIIIIIIGHT!!!





Five stars for knowing what this type of lovely schadenfreude fighting is going to bring us.
kamlem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ussher_chronology

"A different viewpoint comes from Stephen Jay Gould, who, while totally disagreeing with Ussher's chronology, nevertheless wrote:[10]

I shall be defending Ussher's chronology as an honorable effort for its time and arguing that our usual ridicule only records a lamentable small-mindedness based on mistaken use of present criteria to judge a distant and different past

Ussher represented the best of scholarship in his time. He was part of a substantial research tradition, a large community of intellectuals working toward a common goal under an accepted methodology…
"
kamlem
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/library/gould_house-ussher.html

EvilHomer
I love SJG. I know I say this a lot, but I totally would have gone gay for that man.

Jet Bin Fever
Oh man, I bet Pat is shitting his Depends over this one.
Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement