| 73Q Music Videos | Vote On Clips | Submit | Login   |

Reddit Digg Stumble Facebook
Desc:SIGGRAPH 2015
Category:Arts, Science & Technology
Tags:SCIENCE!, Hydrographic Printing
Submitted:Albuquerque Halsey
Date:05/18/15
Views:726
Rating:
View Ratings
Register to vote for this video

People Who Liked This Video Also Liked:
What BYU students know about black people
NICK BRAVO: I'M A REPTILIAN OVERLORD
Fable (1996)
Baby Ducks in Round 3 of Travelers Championship
The Andy Rooney Game: Desk
A Secret Recording of a Mormon Endowment Ceremony
The World is Just Awesome
Human Robot
Scientific Proof David Icke Was Right About Reptilians?
Alex Karras Tells You To Buy Transformers RIGHT NOW (1985).
Comment count is 13
The Mothership
Glad to see that science is hard at work thinking up new and exciting ways to paint tacky porcelain animal figurines.
Jet Bin Fever
Ahh, another use of the kinect that has nothing to do with what Microsoft expected it to be used for!
TheOtherCapnS
This. It gives me an indescribable amount of pleasure that the kinect has turned out to be so utterly worthless for gaming, but world-changing as a piece of mass-produced technology.

Binro the Heretic
So, how long before we get affordable home versions? (still waiting on the affordable 3D printers, by the way)
fluffy
You can get home FDM printers for like 0 now. http://printrbot.com

Building this rig for home use and small objects would probably just need a Kinect (which can be had very cheaply), a linear actuator with controller (pretty cheap), and a fishtank (really cheap).

boner
http://arresteddevelopment.wikia.com/wiki/Dip-A-Pet

SolRo
Affordable as in pick up one in an "As SEEN on TV" box at your local walmart?

Enjoy
Impressed
Oscar Wildcat
I'm not sure whether to applaud them for using an analog computer to do the heavy lifting or laugh at them. Either way it's a bit of a punt for the computational sciences dept, don't you think?
fluffy
Where in the paper/presentation do they say it's an analog computer? I skimmed the paper and I just saw that they were using a simplified/limited version of Navier-Stokes, which I suppose could be done easily enough on an analog computer but there's nothing particularly compelling about doing it that way AFAIK (and the word "analog" never turns up in the paper anyway).

Or are you referring to the actual dipping rig?

Oscar Wildcat
Well I didn't read the paper, and probably should have. I just assumed they were using the dipping tank to read the distortion off the dipped object. As you say, it is in fact a computational technique. So bully for them.

Hooker
At 4:32, they faithfully recreate a huffer.
SolRo
-1 because they didn't make something with an actual checkerboard pattern.
Register or login To Post a Comment







Video content copyright the respective clip/station owners please see hosting site for more information.
Privacy Statement