|StanleyPain - 2016-11-09 |
So, I have a serious question: What exactly happens to the mountains of lawsuits Trump is facing? Do they still proceed as normal or is there some special legal crap that now activates because he's President? How does that work?
As I understand it, there's at least a definitive handful of suits set to hit the courts in the next few months (mostly Trump's usual M.O, non-payment and breach of contract type stuff) that he literally has no defense for. How do civil criminal proceedings work against a sitting President? If he loses some or all of them, doesn't that disqualify him from office? What if the rape lawsuit/trial ends up going through in January?
What a fucking headache.
Haven't you heard? Hillary is a CRIMINAL.
They're both criminals.
The difference is, one of them was, amongst other things, responsible for the Migrant Crisis and the deaths of countless Arab children. The other is about to become your president.
Meh, say what you will about Clinton. At least she never openly bragged about wanting to fuck her own daughter.
Kinda tips the balance for me.
I'm classy that way.
Trump's daughter is fuckable. Hillary's is not.
Between incest and Libya, Syria, Bengazhi, et al., I'd rather the incest! Don't really know how anyone could think otherwise, at least not *rationally* think otherwise - but sure, hit me with your best arguments and let's see what you got.
The 'Migrant Crisis' was manufactured by neo cons. You really a trump supporter EH?
EvilHomer, is this REALLY what you're going to do now, dewd?
Those lawsuits will all clear up after the plaintiffs get sent to the camps.
I'm a voluntaryist. I support each and every one of you.
And yes, Hillary is responsible (to a degree; Obama bears more responsibility, and hopefully he will be prosecuted for it). She was the Secretary of State, and in that capacity, served as one of the chief architects behind the unjustified, imperialist wars which led (predictably enough) to this crisis.
Mr Sputum, you claim that the Migrant Crisis was "manufactured by neo cons". Well yes: Hillary has ALWAYS towed the party line when it came to the neoconservative foreign policy agenda - from Afghanistan to Iraq, clear through Obama's reign of (foreign) terror, and right up to her absolutely reprehensible, last-ditch attempt to scare off politically conservative voters by fabricating a Trump-Russia conspiracy theory - a gambit which threatened to launch WW3, "because hackers & 'Murica". Why else do you think Hillary, despite being nominally "a Democrat", was OPENLY ENDORSED BY THE NEOCONS - including figures as prominent as Michael Hayden and George Bush, Sr? As I have been saying all throughout this selection cycle, THAT is one of the main reasons why Trump appeals to independent voters. Trump's not got blood on his hands. He's never sent arms to terrorists, never lied about Al Qaeda attacks to swing an election, never laughed about the brutal rape and murder of a political leader who dared defy the World Bank. The people of the Middle East aren't fleeing some Russian-backed boogieman dictator; they are fleeing the drones and bombs and CIA-trained radicals that we let loose under Obama and Hillary's watch.
People are sick of it, and this election is part of the fallout.
The good news is, I'm *pretty sure* you guys are going to start waking up to the fact that imperialism is bad, civil liberties are good, etc etc, and you're doign it pretty quickly, too. Last sElection cycle, I posited that the only way to reinvigorate the so-called "anti-war left" would be for Obama to lose and Romney (i.e. Republican Obama) to win. Of course, that didn't happen, and the Democrats kept right on being the party of prosecuting whistleblowers and bombing Arab nations without Congressional approval - but, no. No, this is healthy. You guys are already starting to retcon the War on Terror. Already starting to wake the hell back up. Go with that! Keep it up!
Because I guarantee that, now the Republicans are coming back, they will drop the Tea Party liberalism and eagerly embrace the statist power precedent that Obama and Hillary have set for them. The sooner YOU guys flip back to civil and political libertarians, the better it'll be for everyone.
Hillary and Obama want to instill western values in foreign places.
Trump wants to keep western values exactly where they are and protect them.
Bush, Obama, Hillary and their ilk have done nothing but try to place democracies where they don't belong and meddle in affairs they obviously can't understand. You can tell Obama isn't a Muslim by the way he's destroyed the middle east with fucking drones.
Who knows, Trump could be the best thing to happen to Muslims in 2 decades.
No thanks, EH. It's a bit of a mugs game, don't you think? You get out there and protest, Trump needs you to do this in order to function. It's the lifeblood that sustains him.
Mr Wildcat, I love your optimism. I, myself, have no illusions that Trump will be a civil liberties president; even if he wanted to be, the Deep State runs the show, and the Deep State will continue to do what it pleases, regardless of the figurehead in power.
I'm also not saying you should protest. I'm saying you should withdraw your consent entirely and start focusing, not on remote political (i.e. coercive) solutions, but on local, voluntary, direct-action ones. The inner mystery of the 33rd Degree of Homer is that you should stop praying to the Gods to bring you rain, and instead focus on bringing the rain yourself!
If you must protest, do it to inform the people, not to sway the state.
Remember when EvilHomer wasn't boring?
Yeah, remember when I was a libertarian?
I love all of you, and I am truly sorry that you guys hurt so badly right now.
The pain will soon pass, though. Hillary is done for, and that means the fever has broken.
|Lord_Crocodilicus - 2016-11-09 |
Isn't it funny...?
fuck you. eat my shit.
Croc, that's the pot calling the kettle black. Class is a two way street and you got ways to go.
BTW: I'm really looking forward to Lef being a linked tag.
Me being classless on this site?
That's rich. It's also patently untrue, but you're welcome to believe it even thought you just made it up for no reason.
You know this site is pretty well dedicated to making fun of lunatics, degenerates and imbeciles. You are at least dimly aware that you were likely to be perceived as falling into all or some of these categories (it's all of them, to be very clear, you piece of shit). Why do you expect better treatment than everybody else on the site despite holding views that were, by your own admission, going to get you reviled here? People here get called maggoty cunts for liking the wrong video game. You dumb, sock-sniffing fuckass.
Apart from anything else, it's your oozing, obsequious, apologetic tone. You are the Uriah Heep of the alt-right. You might have got more respect if you didn't think you were somehow owed it. Fuck you. Die. I mean it.
|That guy - 2016-11-09 |
This is pretty much right in line with how I don't know how to think about this site come Nov 9, 2016.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|