|zatojones - 2007-06-19 |
P.S. It's not art
|boba. - 2007-06-19 |
I SAY IT'S ART
|jihadbaby - 2007-06-19 |
|kingarthur - 2007-06-19 |
It's engineering. Though it could have aesthetic value if it opened onto a view or if the building were in some other way special.
|Caminante Nocturno - 2007-06-19 |
Shouldn't there have been a battery of guns or rocket launchers on the other side of that thing?
|fluffy - 2007-06-19 |
Engineering is necessary to build art. It's art.
|coprolalia - 2007-06-19 |
Art isn't about "aesthetic value". It has to disturb somebody.
|MK_Ultra - 2007-06-19 |
It's art you retards. Its status as art isn't predicated on whether or not you like it.
|bopeton - 2007-06-19 |
Neat thingy with no useful purpose = art.
|Namor - 2007-07-14 |
Did we learn nothing from Dada? Yes, it's art you heathens.
| Register or login To Post a Comment|