kingarthur - 2010-02-19
Oh, Rachel...will you marry me?
Also, nothing on Tancredo's crazy-ass literacy test comment?
|
pastorofmuppets - 2010-02-19 Did you mean in this video or at all? Because this is great, as far as terrifying this go: http://www.poetv.com/video.php?vid=74657
|
APE_GOD - 2010-02-19
The myth of a liberal media is something straight out of Orwell's 1984 with the added horror of its audience having access information and information technology and still believing it.
These are the same people who believe that in America, Christians are persecuted because of their faith.
|
|
Caminante Nocturno - 2010-02-19
This video may have the greatest preload image in the history of POETV.
|
memedumpster - 2010-02-19
She is way more of a man than the anti-gay douche who tried to bully her... or any other male Republican ever... and Senate Democrats... aw, screw it, she's the only man around.
|
|
|
|
eatenmyeyes - 2010-02-19 Theodore Roosevelt. Know your history, memedumpster.
|
memedumpster - 2010-02-19 Rachel Maddow wouldn't have let Woodrow Wilson become president and be the bastard he was. Theo's a puss compared to her. There would have been no Birth of a Nation shown in Maddow's second term White House.
|
Camonk - 2010-02-19 If the anti-gay guy had hit her, Maddow would've just head-butted him.
Teddy shot a bear. Big effing deal.
|
|
|
Billie_Joe_Buttfuck - 2010-02-19
damnit, now i want an anti-gay marriage souvenir pen, too.
|
|
Udderdude - 2010-02-19
She looks pretty hawt with those glasses on.
|
theSnake - 2010-02-19
Consumer's Guide to the Apocalypse
I couldn't sum up the Republican platform better in a thousand years.
|
|
Stopheles - 2010-02-19 Conservapedia on Poe's Law:
"Poe's law is often used to mock conservatives and fundamentalists, based on its implicit assertion that fundamentalists and conservatives are so absurd as to be indistinguishable from parody. However, there is a fundamental flaw in this assertion. One might as well argue that genuine works of art are indistinguishable from cheap knockoffs, because some people are unable to distinguish between the two. Clearly, the cause of the mistake is not that the genuine article is no better than a mockery; rather, the cause of the mistake is that some people lack the critical thinking skills and/or experience to differentiate the two -- particularly in cases when an artist (or a parodist) goes to special efforts to emulate the genuine article."
|
pastorofmuppets - 2010-02-19 Reading Conservapedia's take on poe's law is kind of like looking into two mirrors reflect each other.
|
RomancingTrain - 2010-02-19 Conservapeida is a refutation of Poe's Law, Andy Schlafly and his cadre of mods consistently post the most ridiculous, hateful things and their authenticity is beyond question.
|
Syd Midnight - 2010-02-20 Are these also the same guys who rationalize Stephen Colbert as being on their side?
|
phalsebob - 2010-02-19
I have to go to CPAC at some point in my life. It's like a vaudeville buffet with some free lunacy to take home.
I particularly 'like' the awol group of law enforcers who break the law.
|
chumbucket - 2010-02-19
NORMAL PEOPLE!!!!
5 for shedding light on the cuckoo for cocoa puffs nature of New Hampshire
|
themilkshark - 2010-02-19
Don't fuck with Rachel Maddow, I will sock you in the mouth if I catch you.
|
Camonk - 2010-02-19
Tradition, Family and Property...
TFAP?
|
Hooper_X - 2010-02-19
Oh, Rachel Maddow. I love you.
|
Register or login To Post a Comment |